> I reviewed the functions here and believe the ones you added checks > for all look good.
Thanks for your positive feedback. > Though Joe's comment on the relative order of where the > annotation appears in the function declarations should be addressed in > a V2 IMO. Would you be looking for a subsequent change also by the means of the semantic patch language with which the (function) attributes can be adjusted to the ordering that you would prefer finally? Regards, Markus
