On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 20:10 +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > The order of the terms in ParenType require implementing a special
> > case for ParenType. This case handles only the following:
> …
>
> It seems that this change description was repeated in other update
> steps.
Whoops, dumb mistake.
> The order of the terms in ParenType require implementing a special
> case for ParenType. This case handles only the following:
…
It seems that this change description was repeated in other update steps.
Does this detail indicate a need to reconsider the patch granularity?
Regards,
Markus
The order of the terms in ParenType require implementing a special
case for ParenType. This case handles only the following:
( * id [ .* ] ) ( params )
i.e., a function pointer or an array of function pointers, and will fail
for any other cases. This is similar to the function used to
