On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 03:44:25PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2021, Johan Hovold wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 08:54:04PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > pm_runtime_get_sync keeps a reference count on failure, which can lead
> > > to leaks. pm_runtime_resume_and_get
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 3:18 PM Johan Hovold wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 08:54:04PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > pm_runtime_get_sync keeps a reference count on failure, which can lead
> > to leaks. pm_runtime_resume_and_get drops the reference count in the
> > failure case. This rule
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 08:54:04PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> pm_runtime_get_sync keeps a reference count on failure, which can lead
> to leaks. pm_runtime_resume_and_get drops the reference count in the
> failure case. This rule very conservatively follows the definition of
>
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 08:54:04PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > pm_runtime_get_sync keeps a reference count on failure, which can lead
> > to leaks. pm_runtime_resume_and_get drops the reference count in the
> > failure case. This rule very
pm_runtime_get_sync keeps a reference count on failure, which can lead
to leaks. pm_runtime_resume_and_get drops the reference count in the
failure case. This rule very conservatively follows the definition of
pm_runtime_resume_and_get to address the cases where the reference
count is unlikely
