> ParenType and FunctionType are types present in the C AST that
> are not present in the SmPL AST.
Can the understanding of mentioned details be improved by reconsidering
the usage of abbreviations?
> In the pursuit of aligning both the C and SmPL ASTs,
I find this approach also helpful.
>
ParenType and FunctionType are types present in the C AST that
are not present in the SmPL AST. In the pursuit of aligning
both the C and SmPL ASTs, add these types to the SmPL ASTs.
For a function pointer as follows:
int (*x)(params)
The SmPL AST would be as follows:
ParenType -> Pointer ->
