On Sun, Oct 06, 2019 at 07:34:49AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> Would you like to increase your software development attention for
> >> efficient system configuration on this issue?
> >
> > No.
>
> Thanks for this information.
>
> I am still curious if other contributors will care more for
>> Would you like to increase your software development attention for
>> efficient system configuration on this issue?
>
> No.
Thanks for this information.
I am still curious if other contributors will care more for this aspect.
Regards,
Markus
On Sun, 6 Oct 2019, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> Would you like to take the change possibility into account
> >> that the coccicheck system configuration should be adapted instead?
> >>
>> Would you like to take the change possibility into account
>> that the coccicheck system configuration should be adapted instead?
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/scripts/coccicheck?id=4ea655343ce4180fe9b2c7ec8cb8ef9884a47901#n257
>
> I prefer the one
>> Would you like to take the change possibility into account
>> that the coccicheck system configuration should be adapted instead?
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/scripts/coccicheck?id=4ea655343ce4180fe9b2c7ec8cb8ef9884a47901#n257
>
> I prefer the one
On Sat, 5 Oct 2019, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > You gave Acked-by to the one-liner fix "virtual report",
>
> It was (temporarily?) accepted to use the script “add_namespace.cocci”
> without such a type of SmPL variable.
>
>
> > and I am happy to apply it to my tree.
>
> Would you like to take the
> You gave Acked-by to the one-liner fix "virtual report",
It was (temporarily?) accepted to use the script “add_namespace.cocci”
without such a type of SmPL variable.
> and I am happy to apply it to my tree.
Would you like to take the change possibility into account
that the coccicheck system
>> How do you think about to avoid the addition of the SmPL variable
>> “virtual report” to the script “add_namespace.cocci” if you would dare
>> to integrate my change proposal for an adjusted directory hierarchy?
>
> Perhaps I'm lazy, but i seems simpler to add 20 characters than to move
> all
On Thu, 3 Oct 2019, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Was this patch posted somewhere?
>
> Yes, of course.
>
> YueHaibing's update suggestions are available also by the usual
> mailing list archive interfaces.
> How do you think about to avoid the addition of the SmPL variable
> “virtual report” to the
> Was this patch posted somewhere?
Yes, of course.
YueHaibing's update suggestions are available also by the usual
mailing list archive interfaces.
How do you think about to avoid the addition of the SmPL variable
“virtual report” to the script “add_namespace.cocci” if you would dare
to
> Was this patch posted somewhere?
Yes, of course.
YueHaibing's update suggestions are available also by the usual
mailing list archive interfaces.
How do you think about to avoid the addition of the SmPL variable
“virtual report” to the script “add_namespace.cocci” if you would dare
to
> Coccicheck requires that all rules support the report mode.
I find this requirement not so clear while this operation mode
is reasonable as a default selection.
https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck#modes
I am curious how the software will evolve further also in this area.
Possible
12 matches
Mail list logo
