>> Will the addition of such an annotation in a function declaration
>> become supported for the semantic patch language?
>
> Perhaps some day.
The desired modification for a known preprocessor symbol like “__must_check”
points software development challenges out.
But the following SmPL script
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019, Markus Elfring wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to try the following transformation approach out with
> the software combination “Coccinelle 1.0.8-4-g842075f7”.
>
> @addition@
> identifier f;
> type rt != void;
> @@
> rt
> +__must_check
> f(...);
>
>
>
Hello,
I would like to try the following transformation approach out with
the software combination “Coccinelle 1.0.8-4-g842075f7”.
@addition@
identifier f;
type rt != void;
@@
rt
+__must_check
f(...);
elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/janitor> spatch --parse-cocci
use_must_check.cocci
Hello,
I would like to try the following transformation approach out with
the software combination “Coccinelle 1.0.8-4-g842075f7”.
@addition@
identifier f;
type rt != void;
@@
rt
+__must_check
f(...);
elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/janitor> spatch --parse-cocci
use_must_check.cocci
