Re: [Cocci] Checking the influence of “virtual” SmPL variables

2019-10-13 Thread Markus Elfring
>> https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/issues/35 > > This comment is completely irrelevant. I have got an other view. > There is a difference between a virtual rule, that one can declare > as being matched or not from the command line, and a virtual metavariable > in a script, that has to

Re: [Cocci] Checking the influence of “virtual” SmPL variables

2019-10-13 Thread Julia Lawall
On Sun, 13 Oct 2019, Markus Elfring wrote: > >>>virtual patch > >> > >> This variable should be omitted if it will not be used in subsequent SmPL > >> rules. > > > > There is no harm to have it. > > Can you get additional software development concerns if you would look at > a bug report on

Re: [Cocci] Checking the influence of “virtual” SmPL variables

2019-10-13 Thread Markus Elfring
>>>virtual patch >> >> This variable should be omitted if it will not be used in subsequent SmPL >> rules. > > There is no harm to have it. Can you get additional software development concerns if you would look at a bug report on a topic like “Metavariables with the type "virtual" prevent