> > Can such facts influence the specification of efficient SmPL disjunctions
> > another bit?
>
> On my machine, putting the three functions that you have foudn to be the
> most frequent at the end of each disjunction has no impact on the performance.
I propose to reconsider this view.
> So
On Sun, 18 Oct 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > …
> > > +E = \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\|krealloc\|kcalloc\|
> > > + kmalloc_node\|kzalloc_node\|kmalloc_array\|
> > > + kmalloc_array_node\|kcalloc_node\)(...)@kok
> > …
> >
> > How do you think about the possibility for any
> …
> > +E = \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\|krealloc\|kcalloc\|
> > + kmalloc_node\|kzalloc_node\|kmalloc_array\|
> > + kmalloc_array_node\|kcalloc_node\)(...)@kok
> …
>
> How do you think about the possibility for any adjustments according to the
> order
> of the mentioned function
