>> I have noticed the patch “tty: serial: fsl_lpuart: fix return value
>> checking”.
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-serial/20200325090658.25967-2-mich...@walle.cc/
…
> I'm not sure what there is to clarify. One can surely write rules that
> find this kind of problem, with a varying rate of fals
>> I have noticed the patch “tty: serial: fsl_lpuart: fix return value
>> checking”.
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-serial/20200325090658.25967-2-mich...@walle.cc/
…
> I'm not sure what there is to clarify.
Such an use case can point some software development challenges out.
> One can surely
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have noticed the patch “tty: serial: fsl_lpuart: fix return value checking”.
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-serial/20200325090658.25967-2-mich...@walle.cc/
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1215542/
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3
Hello,
I have noticed the patch “tty: serial: fsl_lpuart: fix return value checking”.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-serial/20200325090658.25967-2-mich...@walle.cc/
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1215542/
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/25/202
I am curious if such a software transformation c
