>> I am going to present similar questions occasionally.
>
> Please stop.
I hope that I can continue as usual for while according to a desire
to achieve further improvements.
> The chance that people will help you will increase.
This would be nice.
> No one is interested in quantifying
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > *void * __iomem action(...)
> > {...}
> >
> > It's not quite in line with the what-you-see-is-what-you-get principle,
> > but it'll work for your use case.
>
> Usable output is produced after the adjusted position for the macro.
>
>
> *void * __iomem action(...)
> {...}
>
> It's not quite in line with the what-you-see-is-what-you-get principle,
> but it'll work for your use case.
Usable output is produced after the adjusted position for the macro.
elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Linux/next-patched> spatch
On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 09:30 +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > I'm away from my computer right now so can't test this, but try
> > declaring __iomem as an attribute:
>
> @display@
> attribute name __iomem;
> identifier action;
> @@
> *void __iomem * action(...)
> { ... }
>
>
>
> I'm away from my computer right now so can't test this, but try declaring
> __iomem as an attribute:
@display@
attribute name __iomem;
identifier action;
@@
*void __iomem * action(...)
{ ... }
elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/janitor> spatch --parse-cocci
show_iomem_functions2.cocci
…
Hi Markus,
I'm away from my computer right now so can't test this, but try declaring
__iomem as an attribute:
@display@
identifier action;
attribute name __iomem;
@@
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020, 10:21 p.m. Markus Elfring Hello,
>
> The support for data processing with attributes was extended
Hello,
The support for data processing with attributes was extended recently.
https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/commits?q=committer-date%3A%3C2020-06-16
Under which circumstances will a source code analysis approach become supported
by a script (like the following) for the semantic patch
