> like this, it can be better to just pull the common part out into the
> context.
That was definately the case here. After doing that for the other three
rules I had, two of them became identical :) Also, I got more matches,
because there was context I had not anticipated yet. Big win!
signatu
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > The isomorphism that allows ignoring a cast only works when the type
> > metavariable is used only once. You uare using it twice. The fact that
> > you wanted to add it indicates that you really want it to be there.
>
> Aha, I understand. Thank you fo
> The isomorphism that allows ignoring a cast only works when the type
> metavariable is used only once. You uare using it twice. The fact that
> you wanted to add it indicates that you really want it to be there.
Aha, I understand. Thank you for the explanation!
> I think that everything shoul
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> using Coccinelle v1.04 from Debian:
>
> $ spatch -version
> spatch version 1.0.4 with Python support and with PCRE support
>
> The following semantic patch produces a match with current linux-next:
>
> @@
> expression table, dev;
> type T;
> @@
Hi,
using Coccinelle v1.04 from Debian:
$ spatch -version
spatch version 1.0.4 with Python support and with PCRE support
The following semantic patch produces a match with current linux-next:
@@
expression table, dev;
type T;
@@
- (T)of_match_device(table, dev)->data
+ of_device_get
