On Mon, 2019-07-29 at 10:07 -0400, Julia Lawall wrote:
> I see that stracpy is now in linux-next. Would it be reasonable to send
> patches adding uses now?
My preference would be to have:
o A provably correct script If a small subset of
possible conversions are skipped, that's fine.
o As
I see that stracpy is now in linux-next. Would it be reasonable to send
patches adding uses now? Are there any rules for adding calls to
stracpy_pad?
julia
> > > Perhaps this "x =" should also include += and +
> > > and the various other operators that are possible
> > > or does SmPL grammar already do that?
This is now done. It seems to have had no impact.
> Anywhere the return value of strlcpy is used, not just as
> an assignment, is an instance
On Thu, 2019-07-25 at 08:58 -0500, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, Joe Perches wrote:
[]
> > Just for completeness and correctness, as I at
> > least don't find an existing use:
> >
> > Perhaps this "x =" should also include += and +
> > and the various other operators that are
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 20:42 -0500, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > New version. I check for non-use of the return value of strlcpy and
> > address some issues that affected the matching of the case where the first
> > argument involves a pointer dereference.
On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 20:42 -0500, Julia Lawall wrote:
> New version. I check for non-use of the return value of strlcpy and
> address some issues that affected the matching of the case where the first
> argument involves a pointer dereference. Actually, an isomorphism now
> takes care of that
New version. I check for non-use of the return value of strlcpy and
address some issues that affected the matching of the case where the first
argument involves a pointer dereference. Actually, an isomorphism now
takes care of that case, so it doesn't show up in the semantic patch
explicitly any
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 10:28 +, David Laight wrote:
> > From: Joe Perches
> > > Sent: 24 July 2019 05:38
> > > On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 23:27 -0500, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2019-07-23 at
On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 10:28 +, David Laight wrote:
> From: Joe Perches
> > Sent: 24 July 2019 05:38
> > On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 23:27 -0500, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 22:54 -0500, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > > A seantic patch
From: Joe Perches
> Sent: 24 July 2019 05:38
> On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 23:27 -0500, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 22:54 -0500, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > A seantic patch and the resulting output for the case where the third
> > >
On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 23:27 -0500, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2019, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 22:54 -0500, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > A seantic patch and the resulting output for the case where the third
> > > arugument is a constant is attached. Likewise the
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 22:54 -0500, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > A seantic patch and the resulting output for the case where the third
> > arugument is a constant is attached. Likewise the resulting output on a
> > recent linux-next.
> >
> > julia
>
> Nice.
On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 22:54 -0500, Julia Lawall wrote:
> A seantic patch and the resulting output for the case where the third
> arugument is a constant is attached. Likewise the resulting output on a
> recent linux-next.
>
> julia
Nice. Thanks Julia
A couple issues:
There is a problem with
A seantic patch and the resulting output for the case where the third
arugument is a constant is attached. Likewise the resulting output on a
recent linux-next.
julia// spatch.opt -j 44 ~/linux-next stracpy.cocci --all-includes
--include-headers-for-types --very-quiet > stracpy.out
@r@
On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 15:52 -0500, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2019, Joe Perches wrote:
> > I just sent a patch to add yet another string copy mechanism.
> >
> > This could help avoid misuses of strscpy and strlcpy like this
> > patch set:
> >
> >
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019, Joe Perches wrote:
> Hello Julia.
>
> I just sent a patch to add yet another string copy mechanism.
>
> This could help avoid misuses of strscpy and strlcpy like this
> patch set:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1562283944.git@perches.com/T/
>
> A possible cocci
Hello Julia.
I just sent a patch to add yet another string copy mechanism.
This could help avoid misuses of strscpy and strlcpy like this
patch set:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1562283944.git@perches.com/T/
A possible cocci script to do conversions could be:
$ cat str.cpy.cocci
17 matches
Mail list logo
