On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 17:01 +0530, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 11:59 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Jan 2020, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 11:40 +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > > > In certain cases, there is no space added after the Pointer
On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 11:59 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2020, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 11:40 +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > > In certain cases, there is no space added after the Pointer
> > > > type.
> > >
> > > Will such a pretty-printing detail
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 11:40 +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > In certain cases, there is no space added after the Pointer type.
> >
> > Will such a pretty-printing detail matter also for the clarification
> > of
> > a topic like “Make change
> In certain cases, there is no space added after the Pointer type.
Will such a pretty-printing detail matter also for the clarification of
a topic like “Make change influence configurable for coding style rules”?
https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/issues/37
Regards,
Markus
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
> In certain cases, there is no space added after the Pointer type.
> Examples of such cases are * const, * __attr and * const *.
>
> In the Pointer case of pp_type_with_ident_rest and pp_type_left, if
> the * is followed by anything within the type,
