On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Ondřej Kuzník wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 06:01:07PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Ondřej Kuzník wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 05:52:14PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >>> So you want to drop the braces if there is no comment and keep the
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Ondřej Kuzník wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 04:09:30PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > The problem is in the rule shortcut_replace. You have:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > There are three case (1, 2, and 3). Normally a disjunction like this
> > matches from top to bottom, ie if
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 04:09:30PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> The problem is in the rule shortcut_replace. You have:
>
> [...]
>
> There are three case (1, 2, and 3). Normally a disjunction like this
> matches from top to bottom, ie if the first case matches the ohers are not
> considered.
The problem is in the rule shortcut_replace. You have:
(
-{
-\( T buf = {...}; \| T buf = I; \| T buf; \| \)
-snprintf@p1( buf, E, format1, args );
-Debug@p2( L, format2, args_before, buf, args_after );
+Debug( L, merged, args_before, args, args_after );
-}
|
{
-\( T buf = {...}; \| T buf = I;
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:05:04PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2017, Ondřej Kuzník wrote:
>> OK, I understand. I any case, the suggestion below has very few false
>> negatives and no false positives that I could find, thanks a lot!
>>
>> The only false negatives are related to
On Wed, 30 Aug 2017, Ondřej Kuzník wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 07:25:00AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Ondřej Kuzník wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:17:53PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >>> Allowing format list to match strings in multiple pieces seems like a
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 07:25:00AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Ondřej Kuzník wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:17:53PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>> Allowing format list to match strings in multiple pieces seems like a
>>> somewhat complex undertaking.
>>
>> Again, I have
On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Ondřej Kuzník wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:17:53PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Ondřej Kuzník wrote:
> >> Hi again,
> >> having achieved some consensus to go ahead with this in the project and
> >> some time to spare again, I have started on
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:17:53PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Ondřej Kuzník wrote:
>> Hi again,
>> having achieved some consensus to go ahead with this in the project and
>> some time to spare again, I have started on refining the patch to get as
>> large
>> part of the
On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Ondřej Kuzník wrote:
> Hi again,
> having achieved some consensus to go ahead with this in the project and
> some time to spare again, I have started on refining the patch to get as large
> part of the OpenLDAP source code converted as possible.
>
> There seem to be a few
On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Ondřej Kuzník wrote:
> Hi again,
> having achieved some consensus to go ahead with this in the project and
> some time to spare again, I have started on refining the patch to get as large
> part of the OpenLDAP source code converted as possible.
>
> There seem to be a few
11 matches
Mail list logo
