On Thu, 3 Sep 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 17:14 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Sep 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 22:46 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2 Sep 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 20:41 +0200,
On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 17:14 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 22:46 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2 Sep 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 20:41 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, 30 Aug 2020, Joe
On Thu, 3 Sep 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 17:14 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Sep 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 22:46 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2 Sep 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 20:41 +0200,
On Wed, 2 Sep 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 22:46 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2 Sep 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 20:41 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 30 Aug 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 17:46
On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 23:38 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 22:46 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2 Sep 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 20:41 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, 30 Aug 2020, Joe
On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 22:46 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 20:41 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > On Sun, 30 Aug 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 17:46 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > > Unfortunately this
On Wed, 2 Sep 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 22:46 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2 Sep 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 20:41 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 30 Aug 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 17:46
On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 20:41 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 17:46 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > Unfortunately this does not work when the declaration
> > is comma terminated and not semicolon terminated.
[]
> I will have to look
On Wed, 2 Sep 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 20:41 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Aug 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 17:46 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > Unfortunately this does not work when the declaration
> > > is comma terminated and
On Sun, 30 Aug 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 17:46 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > The following:
> >
> > @not_int_not_len exists@
> > type T != int;
> > identifier x != len;
> > position p;
> > identifier sysfs =~ "^sysfs_emit.*$";
> > assignment operator aop;
> > @@
> >
> >
On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 17:46 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> The following:
>
> @not_int_not_len exists@
> type T != int;
> identifier x != len;
> position p;
> identifier sysfs =~ "^sysfs_emit.*$";
> assignment operator aop;
> @@
>
> T@p x;
> ...
> x aop sysfs(...)
>
> @@
> type not_int_not_len.T;
On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 17:46 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> [...]
>
> > Thanks, I used the slightly different from your suggestion
> > where sysfs is an identifier with function args and a
> > semicolon after the transform type, (otherwise I get cocci errors).
> > like this below:
> >
> > But it
[...]
> Thanks, I used the slightly different from your suggestion
> where sysfs is an identifier with function args and a
> semicolon after the transform type, (otherwise I get cocci errors).
> like this below:
>
> But it doesn't work (no renaming) when there is an
> initializer to the variable
On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 10:27 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 08:57 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > On Sat, 29 Aug 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is it me not understanding cocci grammar again?
> > >
> > > The problem is
On Sun, 30 Aug 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 08:57 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 29 Aug 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > > Is it me not understanding cocci grammar again?
> >
> > The problem is the loop. You are trying to change something in the body
> > of a
On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 08:57 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> On Sat, 29 Aug 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > Is it me not understanding cocci grammar again?
>
> The problem is the loop. You are trying to change something in the body
> of a loop and the body of a for loop might not be executed.
On Sat, 29 Aug 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> Is it me not understanding cocci grammar again?
The problem is the loop. You are trying to change something in the body
of a loop and the body of a for loop might not be executed. ... means
that the thing must be found on every execution path.
Do
17 matches
Mail list logo
