On Tue, 29 Oct 2019, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Julia
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 5:38 PM Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 25 Oct 2019, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 12:40:52AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 7:13 AM Joe
Hi Julia
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 5:38 PM Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 25 Oct 2019, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 12:40:52AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 7:13 AM Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2019-10-19 at 21:43 +0100, Marc
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 12:40:52AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 7:13 AM Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sat, 2019-10-19 at 21:43 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Alexandre Belloni used
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/9bbcce19c777583815c92ce3c2ff2...@www.loen.fr/
> as a reference,
On Fri, 25 Oct 2019, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 12:40:52AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 7:13 AM Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2019-10-19 at 21:43 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>
> > Alexandre Belloni used
> >
> I always appreciate the code refactoring
> that reduces the object size.
Would you like to compare effects around conversions for
the mentioned wrapper function any more?
Regards,
Markus
___
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 7:13 AM Joe Perches wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2019-10-19 at 21:43 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Providing Coccinelle scripts that scream about perfectly valid code is
> > pointless, and the result is actively harmful.
>
> Doubtful.
>
> If the new code is smaller object code and
On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 06:38:30 +0100,
Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> > If said script was providing a correct semantic patch instead of being
> > an incentive for people to churn untested patches that span the whole
> > tree, that'd be a different story. But that's not what this is about.
>
> What is
>>> I think part of the issue is that the script reports a WARNING
Would anybody like to change this category to “INFO”?
>> How much does this information influence really the stress tolerance
>> and change resistance (or acceptance) for the presented collateral evolution?
>>
> If said script was providing a correct semantic patch instead of being
> an incentive for people to churn untested patches that span the whole
> tree, that'd be a different story. But that's not what this is about.
What is the actual incorrectness with the script?
An option could be to adjust
On Sat, 2019-10-19 at 21:43 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Providing Coccinelle scripts that scream about perfectly valid code is
> pointless, and the result is actively harmful.
Doubtful.
If the new code is smaller object code and correct
than the conversion is worthwhile.
fyi:
There are
On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 12:35:49 +0100,
Markus Elfring wrote:
>
> > I think part of the issue is that the script reports a WARNING
>
> How much does this information influence really the stress tolerance
> and change resistance (or acceptance) for the presented collateral evolution?
>
> Markus has been black-listed by several core maintainers already,
I am still curious if this communication filter will ever be adjusted
in more positive directions.
> I think you're wasting your time arguing.
I hope that also this software development discussion can become
more constructive.
sob., 19 paź 2019 o 14:09 Alexandre Belloni
napisał(a):
>
> On 19/10/2019 11:00:47+0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > While it is useful for new drivers to use devm_platform_ioremap_resource,
> >
> > This is nice.
> >
> >
> > > this script is currently used to spam maintainers,
> >
> > This view
> What are the additional effects?
I suggest to take another look at the commit
7945f929f1a77a1c8887a97ca07f87626858ff42
("drivers: provide devm_platform_ioremap_resource()" from 2019-02-20)
which triggered the discussed software evolution.
On 19/10/2019 11:00:47+0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > While it is useful for new drivers to use devm_platform_ioremap_resource,
>
> This is nice.
>
>
> > this script is currently used to spam maintainers,
>
> This view is unfortunate.
>
> Do we stumble on a target conflict again?
>
>
> >
> I think part of the issue is that the script reports a WARNING
How much does this information influence really the stress tolerance
and change resistance (or acceptance) for the presented collateral evolution?
> While it is useful for new drivers to use devm_platform_ioremap_resource,
This is nice.
> this script is currently used to spam maintainers,
This view is unfortunate.
Do we stumble on a target conflict again?
> often updating very old drivers.
This can also happen.
> The net benefit is
17 matches
Mail list logo
