On Tue, 17 Mar 2020, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
> The order of the terms in ParenType require implementing a special
> case for ParenType. This case handles only the following:
>
>( * id [ .* ] ) ( params )
>
> i.e., a function pointer or an array of function pointers, and will fail
> for
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
> ParenType and FunctionType are now added to the SmPL ASTs. Add
> cases for these types in adjust_pragmas.ml.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaskaran Singh
> ---
> parsing_cocci/adjust_pragmas.ml | 4
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
> ParenType and FunctionType are types present in the C AST that
> are not present in the SmPL AST. In the pursuit of aligning
> both the C and SmPL ASTs, add these types to the SmPL ASTs.
It would be nice to extend the log message to give an example
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
> ParenType and FunctionType are now added to the SmPL ASTs. Add
> cases for these types in index.ml.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaskaran Singh
> ---
> parsing_cocci/index.ml | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/parsing_cocci/index.ml
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
> The order of the terms in ParenType require implementing a special
> case for ParenType. This case handles only the following:
>
>( * id [ .* ] ) ( params )
>
> i.e., a function pointer or an array of function pointers, and will fail
> for
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
> ParenType/FunctionType are now types in the SmPL ASTs. Add
> cases for these types in single_statement.ml.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaskaran Singh
> ---
> parsing_cocci/single_statement.ml | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
> ParenType/FunctionType are now types in the SmPL ASTs. Add
> cases for these types in unparse_ast0.ml.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaskaran Singh
> ---
> parsing_cocci/unparse_ast0.ml | 43 +++
> 1 file changed, 43
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
> To add the types ParenType and FunctionType to the SmPL AST, a
> reduce/reduce conflict with the funproto rule of the SmPL parser
> must be resolved. This requires explicitly identifying a function
> prototype by use of a token (TFunProto).
>
>
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
> The direct_declarator rule and the direct_abstract_d rule are
> present in the C parser. Add similar rules to the SmPL parser so that
> declarators are parsed as they are in the C parser.
>
> For the type ParenType, direct_declarator and
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
> Add a test case to match against an array of function pointers.
> This would previously not work due to differences in the C
> and SmPL ASTs.
>
Thanks for all of the changes in this series!
julia
> Signed-off-by: Jaskaran Singh
> ---
>
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
> ParenType and FunctionType are now added to the SmPL ASTs. Add
> cases for these types in compute_lines.ml.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaskaran Singh
> ---
> parsing_cocci/compute_lines.ml | 11 +++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
> The order of the terms in ParenType require implementing a special
> case for ParenType. This case handles only the following:
>
> ( * id [ .* ] ) ( params )
>
> i.e., a function pointer or an array of function pointers, and will fail
> for
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
> The order of the terms in ParenType require implementing a special
> case for ParenType. This case handles only the following:
>
> ( * id [ .* ] ) ( params )
>
> i.e., a function pointer or an array of function pointers, and will fail
> for
On Wed, 2020-03-18 at 18:31 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
>
> > The direct_declarator rule and the direct_abstract_d rule are
> > present in the C parser. Add similar rules to the SmPL parser so
> > that
> > declarators are parsed as they are in the C
14 matches
Mail list logo
