> if do_take_over_console() return an error in the newport_probe(),
> due to the io virtual address is not released, it will cause a leak.
How do you think about a wording variant like the following?
Subject:
[PATCH v2] console: Complete exception handling in newport_probe()
Change
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/log/scripts/coccinelle/free/iounmap.cocci
>>
>> How do you think about to extend presented software analysis approaches?
>>
> Sorry, I am not familiar with it, I don't know.
Do you find the comments helpful at the beginning of
> Please note you are responding to someone who many kernel maintainers,
> myself included, have on their blacklist
You configured your communication filters for some reasons in this way.
> as they are totally unhelpful.
The development views can vary also around my software contributions.
It
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/log/scripts/coccinelle/free/iounmap.cocci
…
> Sorry, I do not know how to use the SmPL script.
I proposed to take another look at the header of such a file.
I imagine that provided information can trigger further development
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 01:02:45AM +0800, Dejin Zheng wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 05:23:29PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/log/scripts/coccinelle/free/iounmap.cocci
> > >>
> > >> How do you think about to extend
