On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 06:43:08PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > The header mentions this check depends on personal taste. I agree. > > Running coccicheck on patches before I apply them, this SmPL produced > > enough false positives for me that I'd rather see it removed. > > An improvement is coming up, that should be more acceptable. However, > it's being held up by the need for some bug fixes in Coccinelle. A > release of Coccinelle is planned for the beginning of April. Perhaps > it is just as well to just remove this version for now. > > Acked-by: Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr>
Michal, can we have that in v4.6 please? The false positives are annoying... Thanks, Wolfram
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
