On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 09:16 +0800, Chengguang Xu wrote:
> sizeof() will return unsigned value so in the error check
> negative error code will be always larger than sizeof().
This looks like a general class of error in the kernel
where a signed result that could be returning a -errno
is tested
Julia,
> I updated the github version of Coccinelle such that
> patches/0027-genl-const/genl-const.cocci
> will almost parse correctly. The only thing that remains is to change
> attribute into attribute name.
I'm not sure why, but for some reason I thought back then (https://git.k
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > delete [] is now supported by the C++ parser (ie with option --c++).
>
> This is nice.
>
>
> > Note that no C++ specific operators are supported by the semantic
> > patch language.
>
> How will the software situation evolve further for
Dear Coccinelle Team,
While patching source files of a few thousand lines long, I
noticed prohibitively long patch compute times (seemed hanged).
This effectively prevented spatch from being usable.
I attach a minimalistic program and patch replicating the problem.
It seems like presence of
