On Thu, 18 Jun 2020, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 09:56:18PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > @@
> > identifier i,fld;
> > expression e;
> > @@
> >
> > \(\(i\|e.fld\|e->fld\) \& E\)
> >
> > The e will match all of the variants you are concerned about.
>
> Ah, I see! Okay, that's
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 09:56:18PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> @@
> identifier i,fld;
> expression e;
> @@
>
> \(\(i\|e.fld\|e->fld\) \& E\)
>
> The e will match all of the variants you are concerned about.
Ah, I see! Okay, that's good. And the "& E" part is to effectively
collect it into E
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020, NICOLAS PALIX wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I released the 1.0.8 version ported to 20.04 focal
> on the coccinelle PPA.
Thanks!
julia
>
> Regards,
>
>
Hi,
I released the 1.0.8 version ported to 20.04 focal
on the coccinelle PPA.
Regards,
De: "Launchpad PPA"
À: "Nicolas Palix"
Envoyé: Jeudi 18 Juin 2020 20:55:16
Objet: [~npalix/ubuntu/coccinelle/focal] coccinelle 1.0.8~20.04npalix1
(Accepted)
Accepted:
OK:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 08:54:03PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 01:20:45PM +0300, Denis Efremov wrote:
> > > > +@as@
> > > > +expression E1, E2;
> > > > +@@
> > > > +
> > >
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 08:54:03PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 01:20:45PM +0300, Denis Efremov wrote:
> > > +@as@
> > > +expression E1, E2;
> > > +@@
> > > +
> > > +array_size(E1, E2)
> >
> > BTW, is there a way yet in
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 23:19 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 23:15 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > +T x;
> > >
> > > Change the + to ++
>
> Heh, something funny happened
>
> + u16 *foo;
> + u16[2] bar;
>
> ... some code ...
>
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 23:19 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 23:15 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > +T x;
> > >
> > > Change the + to ++
>
> Heh, something funny happened
>
> + u16 *foo;
> + u16[2] bar;
>
> ... some code ...
>
Hi,
On 6/18/20 2:34 PM, Markus Elfring wrote:
> Why did you repeat a typo from the previous patch subject?
Where is the typo? I can't handle your suggestions because your mails constantly
break the threads. I just can't find them after due to missed/wrong In-Reply-To
headers. Again, this mail
Detect an opencoded expression that is used before or after
array_size()/array3_size()/struct_size() to compute the same size.
Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Cc: Kees Cook
Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov
---
Changes in v2:
- python rules moved next to SmPL patterns
- assignment operator used
-
On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 07:59 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > What's the difference between "..." and "... when any"?
>
> A ... B connects an A to the closest B, as you might like in some code
> with lots of locks and unlocks. When any picks up any subsequent B, even
> if there is another B
On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 09:33 +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > You tried it out to move the variable “bar” which is an array of two
> > > pointers.
> >
> > Oops. I just mistyped that when transcribing it to email... It was 'u16
> > bar[2];' in the original.
>
> The intended absence of asterisks
On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 09:19 +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > > > +T x;
> > > >
> > > > Change the + to ++
> >
> > Heh, something funny happened
> >
> > + u16 *foo;
> > + u16[2] bar;
> >
> > ... some code ...
> >
> > -u16 *foo;
> > -u16 *bar[2];
> >
> >
> > What happened to the array
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 23:15 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> > > +T x;
> >
> > Change the + to ++
>
> Hah, I think you mentioned that to me before, but I can never remember
> what it does ...
>
> > There is no guarantee on the order in which the
14 matches
Mail list logo
