On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 02:29:35PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Jan 2014, Michal Marek wrote: > > > On 2013-12-02 14:39, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > > As indicated by Sekhar in [1], there seems to be a tendency to use > > > IS_ERR_VALUE to check the error result for pm_runtime_* functions which > > > make no sense considering commit c48cd65 (ARM: OMAP: use consistent > > > error checking) - the error values can either be < 0 for error OR > > > 0, 1 in cases where we have success. > > > > > > So, setup a coccinelle script to help identify the same. > > > > Julia, Gilles, do you have any objections to this semantic patch? > > No objections. > > Acked-by: Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr>
Thanks, applied to kbuild.git#misc. Michal _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
