Good day,
I am very new to coccinelle, and therefore my question is rather basic, but
unfortunately I wasn't able to find the info online.
I have a very simple cocci rule:
--
@r exists@
identifier a;
identifier x;
position p1, p2;
@@
atomic_dec_and_test(&a->x)@p1
..
>On Tue, 15 Nov 2016, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
>
>
> Good day,
>
>
>
> I am very new to coccinelle, and therefore my question is rather
> basic, but unfortunately I wasn’t able to find the info online.
>
> I have a very simple cocci rule:
>
>
>
>
>You may want to run coccinelle/scripts/idutils_index.sh in your code base.
>Then if you use the argument --use-idutils it will select the relevant files
>up front from the index and be even more >efficient. Skipping means that it
>essentialy did a grep and didn't find anything. If the argument
> >You may want to run coccinelle/scripts/idutils_index.sh in your code base.
> >Then if you use the argument --use-idutils it will select the relevant files
> >up front from the index and be even more >efficient. Skipping means that it
> >essentialy did a grep and didn't find anything. If the
> >You may want to run coccinelle/scripts/idutils_index.sh in your code base.
> >Then if you use the argument --use-idutils it will select the relevant files
> >up front from the index and be even more >efficient. Skipping means that it
> >essentialy did a grep and didn't find anything. If the
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2017, Elena Reshetova wrote:
>
> > The below script can be used to detect potential misusage
> > of atomic_t type and API for reference counting purposes.
> > Now when we have a dedicated refcount_t type and API with
> > security protection implemented, people should be using it
>
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2017, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
>
> > > On Tue, 18 Jul 2017, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > >
> > > > The below script can be used to detect potential misusage
> > > > of atomic_t type and API for reference counting purposes.
> > &g
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Elena Reshetova
> wrote:
> > atomic_as_refcounter.cocci script allows detecting
> > cases when refcount_t type and API should be used
> > instead of atomic_t.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
> > ---
> > scripts/coccinelle/api/atomic_as_refcounter.cocci |
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2017, Elena Reshetova wrote:
>
> > atomic_as_refcounter.cocci script allows detecting
> > cases when refcount_t type and API should be used
> > instead of atomic_t.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
> > ---
> > scripts/coccinelle/api/atomic_as_refcounter.cocci | 102
> +
> On Mon, 14 Aug 2017, Elena Reshetova wrote:
>
> > atomic_as_refcounter.cocci script allows detecting
> > cases when refcount_t type and API should be used
> > instead of atomic_t.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
> > ---
> > scripts/coccinelle/api/atomic_as_refcounter.cocci | 148
> +
> Dear Elena,
Hi Markus!
>
> Why do you insist to use the variables “fname2” till “fname6” in
> this evolving SmPL script (instead of merging them into a single one
> with a special constraint)?
I am pretty new to Coccinelle and Julia has recommended against this approach,
so I was merely fol
Hi, I am very sorry for the delayed reply. Finally unrigging my inbox :(
> A few more small issues:
>
> When you deleted the disjunction, you kept the surrounding parentheses.
> you can drop them (lines 83 and 85).
>
> I guess that the "del" regular expression is supposed to be matching
> delete
> > +identifier fname =~ ".*free.*";
> > +identifier fname2 =~ ".*destroy.*";
> > +identifier fname3 =~ ".*del.*";
> > +identifier fname4 =~ ".*queue_work.*";
> > +identifier fname5 =~ ".*schedule_work.*";
> > +identifier fname6 =~ ".*call_rcu.*";
>
> Personally, I find the above regular expressi
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
>
> > Hi, I am very sorry for the delayed reply. Finally unrigging my inbox :(
> >
> > > A few more small issues:
> > >
> > > When you deleted the disjunction, you kept the surrounding parenthe
>
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2017, Elena Reshetova wrote:
>
> > atomic_as_refcounter.cocci script allows detecting
> > cases when refcount_t type and API should be used
> > instead of atomic_t.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
>
> Acked-by: Julia Lawall
Thank you very much Julia! What is the cor
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2017, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
>
> >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 30 Aug 2017, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > >
> > > > atomic_as_refcounter.cocci script allows detecting
> > > > cases when refcount_t type and API should be used
&g
16 matches
Mail list logo
