On Tue, 29 Oct 2019, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Julia
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 5:38 PM Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 25 Oct 2019, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 12:40:52AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 7:13 AM Joe
Hi Julia
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 5:38 PM Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 25 Oct 2019, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 12:40:52AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 7:13 AM Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2019-10-19 at 21:43 +0100, Marc
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 12:40:52AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 7:13 AM Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sat, 2019-10-19 at 21:43 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Alexandre Belloni used
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/9bbcce19c777583815c92ce3c2ff2...@www.loen.fr/
> as a reference,
On Fri, 25 Oct 2019, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 12:40:52AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 7:13 AM Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2019-10-19 at 21:43 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>
> > Alexandre Belloni used
> >
> I always appreciate the code refactoring
> that reduces the object size.
Would you like to compare effects around conversions for
the mentioned wrapper function any more?
Regards,
Markus
___
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 7:13 AM Joe Perches wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2019-10-19 at 21:43 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Providing Coccinelle scripts that scream about perfectly valid code is
> > pointless, and the result is actively harmful.
>
> Doubtful.
>
> If the new code is smaller object code and
> What are the additional effects?
I suggest to take another look at the commit
7945f929f1a77a1c8887a97ca07f87626858ff42
("drivers: provide devm_platform_ioremap_resource()" from 2019-02-20)
which triggered the discussed software evolution.
> I think part of the issue is that the script reports a WARNING
How much does this information influence really the stress tolerance
and change resistance (or acceptance) for the presented collateral evolution?