> On 8 Apr 2016, at 4:37 PM, Shane Stanley wrote:
>
> But that doesn't help with the problem of bindings for selectedIndex, does it?
>
Well, it provides you with a behaviour that is then trivial to leverage to get
the bindings behaviour you need - just make a radio group container view that
On 8 Apr 2016, at 9:23 AM, Graham Cox wrote:
>
> If you have a bunch of “naked” radio buttons, all having the same target and
> selector (but presumably different tags, so you can distinguish them), they
> will automatically act as a group.
But that doesn't help with the problem of bindings fo
Hi,
I’m using WebView in my app, and I see it implements -performFindPanelAction:
doc says “this operates similarly to NSTextView”. So I hook up a button to it,
with tag set to 1, which should be the ‘showFindPanel’ action tag. But nothing
happens. Since all this magic is internal to WebView, a
> On Apr 7, 2016, at 9:25 AM, Trygve Inda wrote:
>
>> This may be relevant, though it does talk about issues with pref panes as
>> well.
>>
>> http://mjtsai.com/blog/2016/03/31/gatekeeper-bug-in-mac-os-x-10-11-4/
>
> Yup. That sums it up.
>
> The short story: tested with a default Xcode comma
I was just going through my project today and came across my comments in the
code where this happens + the SO link that explains more about this issue.
It seems that this bug was first reported in 2012. Someone claims it’s fixed
on iOS 9.2.1.
Hope this helps
- (void)viewDidAppear:(BOOL)animat
> On 8 Apr 2016, at 9:23 AM, Graham Cox wrote:
>
>
>> On 8 Apr 2016, at 5:36 AM, Nivek Research wrote:
>>
>> I have a number of NSMatrix instances that group radio buttons. Most bind
>> the selectedIndex or selectedTag bindings available on NSMatrix to a numeric
>> value in a model object.
> On 8 Apr 2016, at 5:36 AM, Nivek Research wrote:
>
> I have a number of NSMatrix instances that group radio buttons. Most bind the
> selectedIndex or selectedTag bindings available on NSMatrix to a numeric
> value in a model object. The others bind the contentObjects and
> selectedObject bi
Last week, I filed a sample code bug #25499365 against the ButtonMadness sample
code project.
I’m not sure if that will be enough.
> On Apr 7, 2016, at 1:26 PM, Sean McBride wrote:
>
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:36:51 -0400, Nivek Research said:
>
>> I have a number of NSMatrix instances that grou
On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:36:51 -0400, Nivek Research said:
>I have a number of NSMatrix instances that group radio buttons. Most
>bind the selectedIndex or selectedTag bindings available on NSMatrix to
>a numeric value in a model object. The others bind the contentObjects
>and selectedObject binding
I have a number of NSMatrix instances that group radio buttons. Most bind the
selectedIndex or selectedTag bindings available on NSMatrix to a numeric value
in a model object. The others bind the contentObjects and selectedObject
binding available on NSMatrix. As NSMatrix is informally deprecate
On Apr 7, 2016, at 10:45 , Fritz Anderson wrote:
>
> (2) Is your view controller not a table delegate already?
As you say.
I don’t actually know the answer to the original question, but I wonder if the
problem is that (for a view-based table view) the cell view is archived in a
separate NIB f
On 7 Apr 2016, at 11:35 AM, Dave wrote:
>
> Is it possible to stop an application being activated, I mean, if an attempt
> is made to make an application active it is somehow intercepted by another
> application?
I gather you hope to write the second application — the one that wages a
denial-
On 7 Apr 2016, at 11:04 AM, David Catmull wrote:
>
> I have some buttons in my table cell views, and I wanted to set my view
> controller as their target, but Xcode warns that such objects “may only be
> connected to the table view’s delegate”. The things is, it works as is. Why
> does Xcode w
Could this be relevant to the changes in Xcode for iOS library development
where you have to us archive instead of build to get the correct architectures
in your bundle?
> On Apr 7, 2016, at 12:25 PM, Trygve Inda wrote:
>
>> This may be relevant, though it does talk about issues with pref pane
Hi All,
Is it possible to stop an application being activated, I mean, if an attempt is
made to make an application active it is somehow intercepted by another
application?
All the Best
Dave
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
P
> This may be relevant, though it does talk about issues with pref panes as
> well.
>
> http://mjtsai.com/blog/2016/03/31/gatekeeper-bug-in-mac-os-x-10-11-4/
Yup. That sums it up.
The short story: tested with a default Xcode command line tool that says
"Hello World".
1) Build a command line to
I have some buttons in my table cell views, and I wanted to set my view
controller as their target, but Xcode warns that such objects “may only be
connected to the table view’s delegate”. The things is, it works as is. Why
does Xcode want me to do it that way?
I plan to try refactoring to satis
-openURL is pretty generic, working with any type of URL that there's an app
registered for, so it doesn't have a notion of specific UIs like tabs.
If you send an AppleEvent directly to Safari, there might be a param to control
tab behavior. But that would annoy users who have a different defaul
This may be relevant, though it does talk about issues with pref panes as well.
http://mjtsai.com/blog/2016/03/31/gatekeeper-bug-in-mac-os-x-10-11-4/
> On 7 Apr 2016, at 15:13, Trygve Inda wrote:
>
> My app is built on 10.11.3. It is a prefPane with one command line tool and
> three app bundles
I've seen quite a bit on my newsfeed regarding this...
http://mjtsai.com/blog/2016/03/31/gatekeeper-bug-in-mac-os-x-10-11-4/
https://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2016/04/05/hazel-3-3-8-getting-past-the-gates/
https://forums.developer.apple.com/message/81349#81349
Haven't seen any workarounds yet - hop
My app is built on 10.11.3. It is a prefPane with one command line tool and
three app bundles (four helper tools) in it's bundle. I am getting
GateKeeper warnings on 10.11.4 systems, but not on anything else.
It is manually codesigned with my Developer ID... first the helper tool
frameworks, then
21 matches
Mail list logo