> Since the implementation of -copy is up to you, you could just put > @synchronized(self){…..} around the code in that method. That implements a > lock which should make the copy thread-safe.
No, it wouldn't. It would only ensure that two calls to copy are executed sequentially. You would need to add @synchronized(self) {…} to all other methods that modify the object too to ensure that the object isn't changed during a copy. Lasse Sent with Unibox _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com