Re: Network notifications

2008-04-01 Thread Hamish Allan
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:03 AM, Jens Alfke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You want to set a TXT record for the service. I disagree. If the updates are frequent, this makes a lot of work for every other machine on the LAN to update their mDNSResponder caches. Randall mentioned that there's really

Re: Network notifications

2008-04-01 Thread Jens Alfke
On 1 Apr '08, at 1:35 AM, Hamish Allan wrote: I disagree. If the updates are frequent, this makes a lot of work for every other machine on the LAN to update their mDNSResponder caches. If they're updating every second, then yes, TXT records would be inappropriate. But Randall didn't say

Re: Network notifications

2008-04-01 Thread Randall Meadows
On Apr 1, 2008, at 9:13 AM, Jens Alfke wrote: On 1 Apr '08, at 1:35 AM, Hamish Allan wrote: I disagree. If the updates are frequent, this makes a lot of work for every other machine on the LAN to update their mDNSResponder caches. If they're updating every second, then yes, TXT records would

Re: Network notifications

2008-04-01 Thread Jens Alfke
On 1 Apr '08, at 8:25 AM, Randall Meadows wrote: If they're updating every second, then yes, TXT records would be inappropriate. But Randall didn't say whether the updates were that frequent. I would expect maybe 5-10 over a 2-3 minute period, and then a downtime of about the same;

Network notifications

2008-03-31 Thread Randall Meadows
My app registers a bonjour service, but basically it's really just advertising the web server running on the same machine as my app, with a little extra information pertaining to my app. My app places files in a known location in the hierarchy that apache is serving, and I need to send

Re: Network notifications

2008-03-31 Thread Hamish Allan
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Randall Meadows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But to use DO, there needs to be a known connection between my app and the remote app, right? We don't want this connection What is it that you are averse to? A persistent connection? A fixed handle for your

Re: Network notifications

2008-03-31 Thread Randall Meadows
On Mar 31, 2008, at 12:34 PM, Hamish Allan wrote: On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Randall Meadows [EMAIL PROTECTED] pc.com wrote: But to use DO, there needs to be a known connection between my app and the remote app, right? We don't want this connection What is it that you are averse to?

Re: Network notifications

2008-03-31 Thread Hamish Allan
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Randall Meadows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The two apps that are going to be communicating* will have similar, though not identical life times. In general, my app is going to be launched first, and will be gathering data; the remote app will likely come

Re: Network notifications

2008-03-31 Thread Jens Alfke
On 31 Mar '08, at 11:23 AM, Randall Meadows wrote: My app places files in a known location in the hierarchy that apache is serving, and I need to send out a notification when I make a change that's visible via that hierarchy, so that remote apps can pick up the changes. The docs for