Should be possible, no?
Emacs ;-)
--
Scott Ribe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.killerbytes.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact
Actually, I couldn't agree more with the documentation!
Funny thing is, although I've used the style he advocates for a very long
time (15 years???), I don't agree with his reasoning.
Indentation of *code* should be consistent, an object comes into scope where
it's declared, not at an opening
Scott Ribe wrote:
Anyways, it really is a personal preference. All arguments I've ever seen
that try to claim one style or the other is more correct or safer, are B.S.
(Including the one referenced--the bounds of a block were *ALWAYS*
absolutely vitally important, well before objects
Of course, if you're only talking about a few hundred
lines,
Oh yes, at most. *NEVER* the size code base you're talking about!
--
Scott Ribe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.killerbytes.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list
Am 04.07.2008 um 18:16 Uhr schrieb Gary L. Wade:
For example, this kind of code just bugs me when I'm balancing
braces back-and-forth:
Well, I find *this* one preferable:
#if WE_WANT_TO_ADD_THIS_FEATURE_IN_FINAL_BUILDS
if (thisTestIsTrue newFunctionalityIsAvailable) {
#else
if
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Roni Music
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 1:13 PM
To: cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com
Subject: Re: Style Question (Robert Claeson)
the bottom of the page below has one opinion why one style is superior
the bottom of the page below has one opinion why one style is superior to
the other,
(at least when it comes to C++ and the way C++ objects behave when going out
of scope)
http://www.relisoft.com/book/lang/scopes/2local.html
On 28 Jun 2008, at 06:30, Alex Wait wrote:
I have noticed,
