Thanks for the replies - just got them now as my MobileMe email went
offline for some reason last night...
I noticed that there is some useful info relating to this topic in
the
documentation on Agents and Daemons at
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Rick Hoge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the replies - just got them now as my MobileMe email went offline
for some reason last night...
I noticed that there is some useful info relating to this topic in the
documentation on Agents and Daemons at
Thanks again for that very detailed post - I know it sounds like I'm
being lazy, but there are other parts of the app that would have to be
redesigned to allow the possibility for code use under headless
conditions and it's really important to me to know why this is
necessary. What you
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Rick Hoge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks again for that very detailed post - I know it sounds like I'm being
lazy, but there are other parts of the app that would have to be redesigned
to allow the possibility for code use under headless conditions and it's
I am trying to factor some frameworks so that code used in a
document-based Cocoa app can be shared with command-line tools that
might run on a headless node (no window server).
I've seen some discussion in the past on questions such as whether
NSImage and related classes can be used
Le 11 août 08 à 22:26, Ken Ferry a écrit :
Hi Rick,
I think you might be misreading that technote.. what it says is that
trying to guess which methods are and are not safe doesn't work,
because a method that does not happen to require the windowserver in
one release may require it in another.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Rick Hoge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to factor some frameworks so that code used in a
document-based Cocoa app can be shared with command-line tools that might
run on a headless node (no window server).
I've seen some discussion in the past on
