Jens Lorenz wrote:
> Exactly. It's already used within our own Cocoon-based projects.
> Currently the interface from Cocoon to JState is via an Action.
>
> Well, if your apps grow a bit bigger this tends to get messy.
> It would be great, if we could integrate this into a Java-based
> Flowmap (b
Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
> On 6/18/02 5:03 AM, "Ivelin Ivanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>
>>>6. Multi-page forms are not dominating, and continuation based compared to
>>>even driven (GUI-like) programming approaches.
>>>
>>>10. Torsten asks how xmlfor
Tom,
Here are more details which will hopefully help narrow down the problem.
I was running c2.1-dev, tomcat 4.0.1, win98 box.
I believe the error occured while the attached xslt was processing the
attached xml document.
If necessary I can send my webapp dir.
Looking forward to the next ite
Gianugo,
I've finally tried it and got the following stack trace on the first
page of the XMLForm demo.
:
Personal Information
Personal Information First Name
Last Name
Email
Age
Professional roles GeekH
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> Per-Olof Norén wrote:
>
>> Ivelin Ivanov wrote:
>>
>>> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>>>
> IMNSHO, the flowmap should totally replace actions and deprecate them.
Ahem, I thought we decided *not* to deprecate them, as they make
sense as elements
Christian Haul wrote:
>Anyway, given that we are going to be able to use input modules in
>the sitemap through "{modulename:parameter}" it would be great if it
>would be the same for the flow.
>
>Just another thought (I'm not yet up to speed with the flow so ignore
>if I'm talking rubbish): Is it
I've taken my first crack at this and its undergoing review before I
post it. I dislike both actions and the flowmap. More
specifically principally depending on Javascript.
-Andy
Christian Haul wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
>>
>> Per-Olof Norén wrote:
>>
>>> Ivelin Ivanov wrote:
>>>
>
Christian Haul wrote:
>Anyway, given that we are going to be able to use input modules in
>the sitemap through "{modulename:parameter}" it would be great if it
>would be the same for the flow.
>
>Just another thought (I'm not yet up to speed with the flow so ignore
>if I'm talking rubbish): Is it
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> Per-Olof Norén wrote:
>
>> Ivelin Ivanov wrote:
>>
>>> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>>>
> IMNSHO, the flowmap should totally replace actions and deprecate them.
Ahem, I thought we decided *not* to deprecate them, as they make
sense as elements
On Sat, 22 Jun 2002, Stephan Michels wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Jens Lorenz wrote:
>
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Stephan Michels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "cocoon-dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 3:54 PM
> > Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Sources, the
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Jens Lorenz wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Stephan Michels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "cocoon-dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 3:54 PM
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Sources, the next generation RE: Speedup
> *DirectoryGenerator
>
>
>
> >
>
ivelin 2002/06/22 13:33:06
Modified:src/java/org/apache/cocoon/samples/xmlform WizardAction.java
Log:
clean up
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +3 -39
xml-cocoon2/src/java/org/apache/cocoon/samples/xmlform/WizardAction.java
Index: WizardAction.java
===
ivelin 2002/06/22 13:31:23
Modified:src/documentation/xdocs/howto/xmlform-wizard
howto-xmlform-wizard-4.xml
Log:
clean up
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +4 -36
xml-cocoon2/src/documentation/xdocs/howto/xmlform-wizard/howto-xmlform-wizard-4.x
- Original Message -
From: "Stephan Michels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "cocoon-dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 3:54 PM
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Sources, the next generation RE: Speedup
*DirectoryGenerator
>
> I think it should work like this:
>
> Source source = resolv
ivelin 2002/06/22 12:00:59
Modified:src/documentation/xdocs/howto/xmlform-wizard
howto-xmlform-wizard.xml
Log:
no message
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +3 -2
xml-cocoon2/src/documentation/xdocs/howto/xmlform-wizard/howto-xmlform-wizard.xml
Ok - I'm not familiar with BSF yet - I'll start reading up. For those
interested, I found the following javaworld article that looks like a good
intro: http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-03-2000/jw-03-beans.html
Thanks,
Geoff
-Original Message-
From: William Brogden [mailto:[EMAIL PR
stephan 2002/06/22 11:00:01
Modified:src/scratchpad/src/org/apache/cocoon/components/repository
repository.roles
src/scratchpad/src/org/apache/cocoon/components/repository/impl
SlideSourceRepository.java slide.xconf
> -Original Message-
> From: Geoff Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 10:31 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: asp? chilisoft/iASP
>
>
> I'm not sure I see how to configure VBScript as an extra
> language unless I
> have a jar interpreter like jy
I'm not sure I see how to configure VBScript as an extra language unless I
have a jar interpreter like jython.jar...
Have I missed something?
Geoff
> -Original Message-
> From: Geoff Howard
> Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 9:15 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: asp? chilisoft/
Ah, that may do it. I'll check it out and post back my results for the
archives.
Geoff
-Original Message-
From: Sylvain Wallez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 3:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: asp? chilisoft/iASP
Geoff Howard wrote:
>Has anyone ever
Hi,
It looks like the CVS head is using an out of date version of Excalibur.
I am getting these errors:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.apache.avalon.excalibur.component.ComponentHandler:
method initialize()V not found
at
org.apache.avalon.excalibur.component.ExcaliburComponentManager.ini
Geoff Howard wrote:
>Has anyone ever looked, had success with or know if it's possble to use
>ASP/VBScript for generators?
>I've seen Chilisoft's engine that may hold promise crossplatform, and there
>may be other ways to make it work on Windows.
>
>For the record, I'm not a fan of these techno
22 matches
Mail list logo
