Miles Elam wrote:
So let me see if I'm understanding now. You aren't angry because Tomcat
has its own HTTP stack. You are angry because they seem to be going out
of their way to keep other HTTP stacks from working with it.
Close.
I'm angry because Tomcat people *fail* to see that no matter
Stefano,
absent documentation (the first who says that cocoon docs sucks will
have to figure out how to compile tomcat and connectors from source
before being allowed to speak again)
I want to bet here, i do not say Cocoon docs sucks ;), but building tc
4.1.X and tc 5 is not that hard,
Miles Elam wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I'll never use Tomcat again. Period. The phylosophy behind it (big
servlet engine, light http stack on top) is plain wrong.
I'm confused... One of the features of the newest iterations of Tomcat
is jndi lookups without the whole of EJB behind
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
snip/
I wrote a simple HTTP server for Java 2 MicroEdition over the last weekend,
with rudimentary Servlet-style support, not according to spec at all, just a
simple Servlet interface with two methods.
And even though I use a multithreaded approach, Threadpooling,
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
And handle servlet filters and implement the HTTP 1.1 spec in
totality, right?
As far as HTTPd is concerned, it's a web
server...er...proxy...er...connection hub...er...
no, it's a rock-solid HTTP stack with modular capabilities. It's up to
you on what modules you
Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
* tc4.1.x
b) cvs co jakarta-tomcat-connectors
c) cvs co jakarta-tomcat-jasper
d) cvs co jakarta-tomcat-4
e) cd jakarta-tomcat-4
f) copy build.properties.sample to build.properties tweak to
your need, probably you only need to point base.path to a newly
created
On Wednesday, Feb 5, 2003, at 21:45 Europe/London, Miles Elam wrote:
Pier answered my question with a lot of great information such as
multi-process robustness, fall-back error pages when/if a JVM goes
down, etc. However, I noticed one hole in the setup he proposed: URI
permanence. You'll
sorry to disturb, just have a tiny question:
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im
Auftrag von Dirk-Willem van Gulik
Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Februar 2003 12:26
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [OT rant] there must be some way out of here...
On 4/2/03 23:06, Miles Elam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Honestly, if Cocoon is already demonstrating that PHP
and Perl (directly generating HTML) are suboptimal methods for creating
sites on a large scale, why use HTTPd at all? mod_gzip? Is it really
so much more efficient than a compression
On Monday 03 February 2003 23:57, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I'll never use Tomcat again. Period. The phylosophy behind it (big
servlet engine, light http stack on top) is plain wrong.
This made me remember those golden days when I was sticking to JServ
and.refusing
...there's too much confusion here, I can't get no relief.
Besides quoting Bob Dylan, I'm *PISSED OFF* since I've spent the entire
day trying to get Apache 2.0.x + Tomcat *.* working on Solaris and I
decided to throw everything down the drain.
I'll never use Tomcat again. Period. The
Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...there's too much confusion here, I can't get no relief.
Besides quoting Bob Dylan, I'm *PISSED OFF* since I've spent the entire
day trying to get Apache 2.0.x + Tomcat *.* working on Solaris and I
decided to throw everything down the drain.
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I'll never use Tomcat again. Period. The phylosophy behind it (big
servlet engine, light http stack on top) is plain wrong.
mod_jserv is not supported anymore. :(
mod_jk is piece of [insert your favorite nasty word here] (who is the
genious that invented the concept
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Well, you know where my native code for the connector is :-) Right now, my
suggestion is: use Jetty and proxy-pass HTTP requests through Apache :-) In
the long-ish term, we'll see! :-) :-)
This is where I'm heading now, and this is where I want to work in the
future. I
Gianugo Rabellino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Well, you know where my native code for the connector is :-) Right now, my
suggestion is: use Jetty and proxy-pass HTTP requests through Apache :-) In
the long-ish term, we'll see! :-) :-)
This is where I'm heading now, and
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Well, remember that now in Apache 2.0 mod_proxy and mod_cache are separated,
so, if you achieve proxy full support using HTTP, you'll be able to simply
replace the HTTP proxying module with something (Better? Faster? Is it
really needed?), and keep all that caching magic
Gianugo Rabellino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Well, remember that now in Apache 2.0 mod_proxy and mod_cache are separated,
so, if you achieve proxy full support using HTTP, you'll be able to simply
replace the HTTP proxying module with something (Better? Faster? Is it
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Hm... I don't like squid that much... It doesn't allow you to do a bunch of
nifty stuff that Apache lets you do... It is a little bit faster, but speed
comes at a great price:
For example, you can't direct people to a holding page when the servlet
container is down, and
Gianugo Rabellino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Hm... I don't like squid that much... It doesn't allow you to do a bunch of
nifty stuff that Apache lets you do... It is a little bit faster, but speed
comes at a great price:
For example, you can't direct people to a
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
...there's too much confusion here, I can't get no relief.
Besides quoting Bob Dylan, I'm *PISSED OFF* since I've spent the entire
day trying to get Apache 2.0.x + Tomcat *.* working on Solaris and I
decided to throw everything down the drain.
I feel your pain.
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Well, remember that now in Apache 2.0 mod_proxy and mod_cache are
separated,
so, if you achieve proxy full support using HTTP, you'll be able to
simply
replace the HTTP proxying module with something (Better? Faster? Is it
really needed?), and
On Monday, Feb 3, 2003, at 15:57 Europe/London, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I'm sick of this.
And I'm not alone.
Enough talking, expect action.
Hear Hear!!!
You may remember me moaning about this the other day my heartfelt
commiserations!
Keep up the good work Pier! Stroll on Jetty!
22 matches
Mail list logo
