Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> Ugo Cei wrote:
>> Isn't the interpreted sitemap the default in 2.0.3?
> Yes and no :
> - the interpreted sitemap is used if your cocoon.xconf contains only
>
> - the shipped cocoon.xconf explicitely specifies class="org.apache.cocoon.sitemap.SitemapManager"/> which is th
Ugo Cei wrote:
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
>> No, there is no way around it - again with 2.1 the interpreted sitemap
>> is used instead and this is no longer a problem. Remember, the sunshine
>> components are for the 2.0.3 branch in the scratchpad.
>
>
> Isn't the interpreted sitemap the default
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> No, there is no way around it - again with 2.1 the interpreted sitemap
> is used instead and this is no longer a problem. Remember, the sunshine
> components are for the 2.0.3 branch in the scratchpad.
Isn't the interpreted sitemap the default in 2.0.3?
Ugo
--
Per Kreipke wrote:
>
> Carsten,
>
> Good morning, thanks for your reply.
>
Thanks - I try to do my best...
>
>
> > > - does the resolver automatically cache the source object if
> > possible, and
> > > also watch for changes (it doesn't seem as if any of the Source's are
> > > caching)?
> > >
>
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Per Kreipke wrote:
> Giacomo,
>
> > > I feel like a newbie again.
> > >
> > > It seems as if with every new page or problem to solve, I have
> > a large set
> > > of choices about where I can store information. But where I
> > choose to store
> > > something depends on its li
Carsten,
Good morning, thanks for your reply.
> >
> >
> > - is the Cocoon Source object the same as the Source in
> Excalibur (doesn't
> > seem so, yet they both seem to be used)?
> In 2.0.3 (or from 2.0 to 2.0.4-dev) only the Cocoon source object is used.
> We moved the source resolving to exc
Giacomo,
> > I feel like a newbie again.
> >
> > It seems as if with every new page or problem to solve, I have
> a large set
> > of choices about where I can store information. But where I
> choose to store
> > something depends on its lifetime, cachability, granularity, etc.
> >
> > In a typica
Per Kreipke wrote:
>
>
> - is the Cocoon Source object the same as the Source in Excalibur (doesn't
> seem so, yet they both seem to be used)?
In 2.0.3 (or from 2.0 to 2.0.4-dev) only the Cocoon source object is used.
We moved the source resolving to excalibur and starting with 2.1 only the
exca
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Per Kreipke wrote:
> I feel like a newbie again.
>
> It seems as if with every new page or problem to solve, I have a large set
> of choices about where I can store information. But where I choose to store
> something depends on its lifetime, cachability, granularity, etc.
>
I feel like a newbie again.
It seems as if with every new page or problem to solve, I have a large set
of choices about where I can store information. But where I choose to store
something depends on its lifetime, cachability, granularity, etc.
In a typical servlet model, I understand the differ
10 matches
Mail list logo
