Re: [SITEMAP] Component declaration

2002-04-29 Thread Diana Shannon
Konstantin: > For new users I would prefer a separate distributions: > - Minimal binary: with XML/XSP/XSLT/(maybe FOP) features enabled and > myapp template in WAR format > - Standart binary: all the core and optional features (without > scratchpad) plus docs and samples in WAR format >

RE: [SITEMAP] Component declaration

2002-04-29 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
> From: Konstantin Piroumian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > From: "Vadim Gritsenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > From: Konstantin Piroumian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Hi, Cocooners! > > > > > > A simple question: why in a sub sitemap we need to add > /> if > > > we add anything to the l

Re: [SITEMAP] Component declaration

2002-04-29 Thread Konstantin Piroumian
> > From: Diana Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > 3. Building, even without optional jars, still leaves the sitemap > > overwhelming for new users. I think Konstantin is addressing that > issue > > as well. > > New refactored samples IMHO will simplify main sitemap a lot. Yes, I am clea

Re: [SITEMAP] Component declaration

2002-04-29 Thread Konstantin Piroumian
From: "Vadim Gritsenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > From: Konstantin Piroumian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Hi, Cocooners! > > > > A simple question: why in a sub sitemap we need to add /> if > > we add anything to the list? > > From the sub sitemap: > > > From the sitemap.xsl: >sele

RE: [SITEMAP] Component declaration

2002-04-27 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
> From: Diana Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >> - is it worth making a special target for building a minimal > > Cocoon > >> containing a very minimal set of features? > > > > May be better documenting the process will help. It boils down to just > > couple of steps: > > 1. build clea

Re: [SITEMAP] Component declaration

2002-04-27 Thread Diana Shannon
>> - is it worth making a special target for building a minimal > Cocoon >> containing a very minimal set of features? > > May be better documenting the process will help. It boils down to just > couple of steps: > 1. build clean > 2. rm all optional libs > 3. build -D Of course, improved

RE: [SITEMAP] Component declaration

2002-04-27 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
> From: Konstantin Piroumian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Hi, Cocooners! > > A simple question: why in a sub sitemap we need to add if > we add anything to the list? >From the sub sitemap: >From the sitemap.xsl: If you know better way how in XSLT get default component, you could

Re: [SITEMAP] Component declaration

2002-04-27 Thread Diana Shannon
Konstantin: Great idea! > So, my questions are: > - how to remove > - what is the best place for such a template/sample Information about this could exist in different locations within Cocoon's documentation. Several ideas, in order of increasing value to users: - as an Example: te

[SITEMAP] Component declaration

2002-04-27 Thread Konstantin Piroumian
Hi, Cocooners! A simple question: why in a sub sitemap we need to add if we add anything to the list? Isn't it possible to inherit components implicitly? I ask this, because in response to multiple user requests for having something simple to start with in Cocoon and also for my colleagues I'd