From: "Stefano Mazzocchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> > I still prefer this uri syntax:
> >
> > {foo} (default sitemap module )
> > {pathto/foo} (default sitemap module with path)
> > {module:request://pathto/foo} (complete parameter uri)
>
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> I still prefer this uri syntax:
>
> {foo} (default sitemap module )
> {pathto/foo} (default sitemap module with path)
> {module:request://pathto/foo} (complete parameter uri)
> or
> {parameter://request.module/pat
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> What, aren't you up to date with the Cocoon source base ??? Don't worry,
> I also have some problems to follow the CVS logs ;)
Actually, I have enough of a hard time following my life's change flows
:/
> Anyway, look at org.apache.cocoon.components.modules.input in HEAD,
From: "Sylvain Wallez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>
> >Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> >
> >>Hi team,
> >>
> >>We all agree to add module-based sitemap variables, but we didn't came
> >>to a consensus about it's syntax. So let's vote to make a choice. To
> >>illustrate each possible s
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
>
>>Hi team,
>>
>>We all agree to add module-based sitemap variables, but we didn't came
>>to a consensus about it's syntax. So let's vote to make a choice. To
>>illustrate each possible syntax, I will consider the substitution of the
>>"foo" re
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
> Hi team,
>
> We all agree to add module-based sitemap variables, but we didn't came
> to a consensus about it's syntax. So let's vote to make a choice. To
> illustrate each possible syntax, I will consider the substitution of the
> "foo" request parameter using the "req
On 30.May.2002 -- 11:51 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> From: "Sylvain Wallez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Hi team,
> >
> > We all agree to add module-based sitemap variables, but we didn't came
> > to a consensus about it's syntax. So let's vote to make a choice. To
> > illustrate each possible
> From: Sylvain Wallez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Hi team,
>
> We all agree to add module-based sitemap variables, but we didn't came
> to a consensus about it's syntax. So let's vote to make a choice. To
> illustrate each possible syntax, I will consider the substitution of
the
> "foo" requ
From: "Sylvain Wallez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi team,
>
> We all agree to add module-based sitemap variables, but we didn't came
> to a consensus about it's syntax. So let's vote to make a choice. To
> illustrate each possible syntax, I will consider the substitution of the
> "foo" request pa
On Thursday, May 30, 2002, at 10:06 AM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> We all agree to add module-based sitemap variables, but we
> didn't came to a consensus about it's syntax. So let's vote to
> make a choice. To illustrate each possible syntax, I will
> consider the substitution of t
Hi team,
We all agree to add module-based sitemap variables, but we didn't came
to a consensus about it's syntax. So let's vote to make a choice. To
illustrate each possible syntax, I will consider the substitution of the
"foo" request parameter using the "request" InputModule.
Here are the v
11 matches
Mail list logo
