Nathaniel Alfred wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marc Portier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dienstag, 1. Juli 2003 09:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [woody] binding the forms to data
...
A general load/save binding specification in XML can get pretty
nasty for real-world examples
>-Original Message-
>From: Marc Portier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Dienstag, 1. Juli 2003 09:47
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [woody] binding the forms to data
>
...
>
>> A general load/save binding specification in XML can get pretty
>> nasty
Le Mardi, 1 juil 2003, à 07:36 Europe/Zurich, Marc Portier a écrit :
what do people think?
I'm a bit short on time to study your proposed syntax, but I like the
idea of defining JXPath-like mappings (or bindings) between data and
forms.
Also, being able to use either java classes or XML document
Nathaniel Alfred wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marc Portier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dienstag, 1. Juli 2003 07:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [woody] binding the forms to data
...
The actual binding definition file could be filled with:
I don't see the added val
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc Portier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Dienstag, 1. Juli 2003 07:37
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [woody] binding the forms to data
>
...
>
> The actual binding definition file could be filled with:
>
Hi all,
just want to share some thoughts on a possble nice addition for
the woody forms, feel free to comment
(see http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=Woody for the
miinimal current docs)
the woody forms as of today allow you to define the form-model
(woody-definition file, with some valid
