Re: re-send Excalibur ActiveMonitor

2001-12-06 Thread Berin Loritsch
Gerhard Froehlich wrote: > Hi, > Ok dived into the code: > > I identified 2 places which IMHO the > ActiveMonitor could be placed: > > Source (SitemapSource,URLSource) > and Reader (ResourceReader) > > But a) I only have a vague imagining what > this classes are doing and b) maybe there >

RE: re-send Excalibur ActiveMonitor

2001-12-06 Thread Gerhard Froehlich
Hi, Ok dived into the code: I identified 2 places which IMHO the ActiveMonitor could be placed: Source (SitemapSource,URLSource) and Reader (ResourceReader) But a) I only have a vague imagining what this classes are doing and b) maybe there are some other places! Ideas, Suggestion? Cheers

Re: re-send Excalibur ActiveMonitor

2001-12-06 Thread Per-Olof Norén
- Original Message - From: "Gerhard Froehlich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "cocoon-Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 3:48 PM Subject: re-send Excalibur ActiveMonitor > Hi, > uninteresting, misspelled, needless or > just o

re-send Excalibur ActiveMonitor

2001-12-05 Thread Gerhard Froehlich
wrong place, I have no problem to move this thread >into Avalon dev list.) > >Berin suggested in the mail: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=99857216131771&w=2 >that instead of calling ${file}.lastModified() we asking the >Excalibur ActiveMonitor if the

Excalibur ActiveMonitor

2001-12-02 Thread Gerhard Froehlich
t.) Berin suggested in the mail: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=99857216131771&w=2 that instead of calling ${file}.lastModified() we asking the Excalibur ActiveMonitor if the resource has changed or not. "Each resource in the collection of resources is tested on a fre