RE: CachingProcessingPipeline: new Expires code

2003-02-25 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Gianugo Rabellino wrote: > > Ah ok, does this mean that if an expires date is set, you want to > > cache the pipeline, regardless if all components in this > pipeline support > > the Cacheable... interface? > > Exactly. Meaning that the "expires" setting is a way to tell the > pipeline engine t

Re: CachingProcessingPipeline: new Expires code

2003-02-25 Thread Gianugo Rabellino
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: , then some more changes are needed to take into account that an expires header is present: if so, there should be a way to both generate the key and cache the output and to update/remove entries from the cache if the expires header is changed or r

RE: CachingProcessingPipeline: new Expires code

2003-02-25 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Gianugo Rabellino wrote: > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > >>, then some > >>more changes are needed to take into account that an expires header is > >>present: if so, there should be a way to both generate the key > and cache > >>the output and to update/remove entries from the cache if the expires >

Re: CachingProcessingPipeline: new Expires code

2003-02-25 Thread Gianugo Rabellino
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: , then some more changes are needed to take into account that an expires header is present: if so, there should be a way to both generate the key and cache the output and to update/remove entries from the cache if the expires header is changed or removed from the pipelin

RE: CachingProcessingPipeline: new Expires code

2003-02-25 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
> -Original Message- > From: Gianugo Rabellino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 5:08 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CachingProcessingPipeline: new Expires code > > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > I would say: co

Re: CachingProcessingPipeline: new Expires code

2003-02-24 Thread Gianugo Rabellino
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: I would say: commit it and we (I?) can review it. Done. Fire at will. :-) Two things to consider and still on my TODO: 1. I understand from AbstractCachingProcessingPipeline that a cache entry is not going to be built if the generator is not cacheable. Also, the cache p

Re: CachingProcessingPipeline: new Expires code

2003-02-24 Thread Jeremy Quinn
On Monday, February 24, 2003, at 02:09 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: I would say: commit it and we (I?) can review it. Sounds great! +1 well done, SQL caching here we come! regards Jeremy

RE: CachingProcessingPipeline: new Expires code

2003-02-24 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
I would say: commit it and we (I?) can review it. Sounds great! Carsten > -Original Message- > From: Gianugo Rabellino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 3:07 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: CachingProcessingPipeline: new Expires code > > > I finally sat