Re: Check Source

2002-01-27 Thread Bernhard Huber
Hi, team > >I have no problems about having cocoon-specific javadoc tags (if >properly namespaced like @cocoon:deprecated which is what you are >proposing, so I'm cool) but what I would really want is a doclet that >outputs XML that we could later incorporate seemlessly with our >documentation! >

Re: Check Source

2002-01-27 Thread Michael Hartle
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: >I have no problems about having cocoon-specific javadoc tags (if >properly namespaced like @cocoon:deprecated which is what you are >proposing, so I'm cool) but what I would really want is a doclet that >outputs XML that we could later incorporate seemlessly with our >do

Re: Check Source

2002-01-27 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Bernhard Huber wrote: > > hi, nikola > > >>adding some javadoc tags in orde to generate reference documentation. > >> > > > >I think it's super! :-) Me too. > >It would be nice if also xsl stylesheets have this feature; IIRC some > >taglibs > >already do. there is something called xsldoc but

Re: Check Source

2002-01-26 Thread Bernhard Huber
hi, nikola >>adding some javadoc tags in orde to generate reference documentation. >> > >I think it's super! :-) >It would be nice if also xsl stylesheets have this feature; IIRC some >taglibs >already do. > >Just one thing: in the examples you posted, there is ErrorNotifier which is >deprecated;

Re: Check Source

2002-01-26 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
From: "Bernhard Huber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ... > adding some javadoc tags in orde to generate reference documentation. > > So adding in the class java-doc @cocoon:name XInclude, and perhaps some > more additional tags will allow to generate reference documentation from > the java-sources. > > I

Re: Check Source

2002-01-26 Thread Bernhard Huber
hi, okay, imposing a restrictive coding schema is bad. I think i have posted a similar suggestion, adding some javadoc tags in order to generate reference documentation. So adding in the class java-doc @cocoon:name XInclude, and perhaps some more additional tags will allow to generate referenc

Re: Check Source

2002-01-25 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Friday 25 January 2002 11:13, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > . . . > Currently we have 13000 style errors? I personally don't care. I agree - from the feature list at http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/, I find only two that (IMHO) can have a real influence on code quality, that is -Detecting va

RE: Check Source

2002-01-25 Thread Morrison, John
> From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > "Morrison, John" wrote: > > > > I think I may need to back out of the commit for CheckStyle. > > This was posted to the Ant-User list: > > > > "> Does anyone know the legalities of including this in > binary format > > > with an Apache lice

Re: Check Source

2002-01-25 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
"Morrison, John" wrote: > > I think I may need to back out of the commit for CheckStyle. > This was posted to the Ant-User list: > > "> Does anyone know the legalities of including this in binary format > > with an Apache license project?? > > Legally, you can't - you could provide it as two se

RE: Check Source

2002-01-25 Thread Morrison, John
I think I may need to back out of the commit for CheckStyle. This was posted to the Ant-User list: "> Does anyone know the legalities of including this in binary format > with an Apache license project?? Legally, you can't - you could provide it as two separate downloads, though, but only of you

RE: Check Source

2002-01-24 Thread John Morrison
> From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, 24 January 2002 8:44 pm > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Check Source > > > "Morrison, John" wrote: > > > > It's added. > > > > There's a new target (

Re: Check Source

2002-01-24 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
"Morrison, John" wrote: > > It's added. > > There's a new target (checkSource), which, basically, checks > all .java files in src/java. > > If we don't agree with *how* or *what* it's checking, we can > modify it in the future. oh god! I knew it would have happened! > If somebody could take a

RE: Check Source

2002-01-24 Thread Morrison, John
It's added. There's a new target (checkSource), which, basically, checks all .java files in src/java. If we don't agree with *how* or *what* it's checking, we can modify it in the future. If somebody could take a look wrt the licenses I'd be greatful: checkstyle-1.4.jar is an Apache Style one

Re: Check Source

2002-01-24 Thread Ross Gardler
I'm new to this list and have yet to contribute in any way. However, I feel sure that my opinion will be as valid as any other so here goes... I feel that conformance to coding standards is very important any project. In my internal projects I always enforce adherence to these standards (and w