Geoff Howard wrote:
From: Unico Hommes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can't believe I've missed this post. Damn.
Below is the larger picture I envision for a new kind of cache
invaliditation
...
depending on other factors might never come. It seems to me more
fitting
with
I can't believe I've missed this post. Damn.
Below is the larger picture I envision for a new kind of cache
invaliditation
that I've needed in the past and comes up in requests from people
using
EJB
or
database driven data that is cacheable. I'd love feedback from anyone
who's
From: Unico Hommes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can't believe I've missed this post. Damn.
Below is the larger picture I envision for a new kind of cache
invaliditation
...
depending on other factors might never come. It seems to me more
fitting
with the transient nature of events to
Geoff Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Below is the larger picture I envision for a new kind of
cache invaliditation that I've needed in the past and comes
up in requests from people using EJB or database driven data
that is cacheable. I'd love feedback from anyone who's
interested.
