Re: Log level, compatibility

Geoff Howard wrote: At 02:14 AM 6/4/2003, Konstantin wrote: +1 for lowering the log level to WARN. But it'd be much better to provide two (or more) typical configurations, e.g.: - development: log level - DEBUG, development cache settings, etc. - testing: log level - WARN, etc. INFO should

Re: Log level, compatibility (was: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20445] New: - i18n transformer does notrecognize 2.0 namespace)

At 02:14 AM 6/4/2003, Konstantin wrote: +1 for lowering the log level to WARN. But it'd be much better to provide two (or more) typical configurations, e.g.: - development: log level - DEBUG, development cache settings, etc. - testing: log level - WARN, etc. - production: log level - ERROR,

RE: Log level, compatibility

> -Original Message- > From: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Geoff Howard wrote: > > > At 02:14 AM 6/4/2003, Konstantin wrote: > > > >> +1 for lowering the log level to WARN. > >> But it'd be much better to provide two (or more) typical > configurations, > >> e.g.: > >> - dev