Re: Question was: Re: [RT] reconsidering pipeline semantics

2002-07-04 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Diana Shannon wrote: > Can someone help fill in the holes below? > > On Wednesday, July 3, 2002, at 10:10 AM, Jason Foster wrote: > >> We should really get this in a FAQ somewhere! >> What's the difference between having two pipelines with one matcher each, and one pipeline with two ma

Re: Question was: Re: [RT] reconsidering pipeline semantics

2002-07-03 Thread Diana Shannon
Can someone help fill in the holes below? On Wednesday, July 3, 2002, at 10:10 AM, Jason Foster wrote: > We should really get this in a FAQ somewhere! > >>> What's the difference between having two pipelines with one matcher >>> each, and one pipeline with two matchers? >> >> If there is no oth

Re: Question was: Re: [RT] reconsidering pipeline semantics

2002-07-03 Thread Jason Foster
We should really get this in a FAQ somewhere! >> What's the difference between having two pipelines with one matcher >> each, and one pipeline with two matchers? > > If there is no other difference in pipeline declarations, then none. > > Pipelines can differ by: > - visibility: internal (n

RE: Question was: Re: [RT] reconsidering pipeline semantics

2002-07-03 Thread Piroumian Konstantin
> From: Justin Fagnani-Bell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > I hope this isn't to dumb a question, but I've been wondering > it for a > while: > > What's the difference between having two pipelines with one matcher > each, and one pipeline with two matchers? If there is no other difference in