Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
But if you look at SitemapLanguage, which is a subclass of
DefaultTreeBuilder, you will notice that its createComponentManager()
method creates a new CocoonComponentManager and configures it with
. So defines components of the
sitemap j
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
2. Where does the treeprocessor actually create these components? ;-P
It seems that methods are calling methods that are... you get the
picture... I've got not much time to dwelve into that code, but
I looked at the DefaultTreeBuilder.java,
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
2. Where does the treeprocessor actually create these components? ;-P
It seems that methods are calling methods that are... you get the
picture... I've got not much time to dwelve into that code, but
I looked at the DefaultTreeBuilder.java, but still I'm puzzled.
"Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>>
>> Somehow, well, yes, but at the same time, no... WEB-INF is (IMO) a hack
>
>
>
> Yes, the reliance on web.xml is really ugly and stook because we really
> only used it as a servlet for so much time. We have mused somet
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
"Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
The only thing I have "against" this is to start thinking about making
"WEB-INF" an optional feature (all throughout the code)... It should be a
configurable feature.
The "web application" concept co
"Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>>
>> The only thing I have "against" this is to start thinking about making
>> "WEB-INF" an optional feature (all throughout the code)... It should be a
>> configurable feature.
>>
>> The "web application" concept collides w
> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Suggestions?
>
> The fact is that cocoon.xconf was moved to WEB-INF for
> security reasons.
> In that servlet environment I would surely move the blocks under
> WEB-INF. IMHO it's simple enough to imagine that in all other
> environmen
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 30/1/03 9:09, "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Starting the blocks walk done with microchanges.
Yeah! :-)
microstep 1: loading of components from blocks
--
goal
--
The goal is that if I specify:
On 30/1/03 9:09, "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Starting the blocks walk done with microchanges.
Yeah! :-)
> microstep 1: loading of components from blocks
> --
>
> goal
> --
>
> The goal is that if I specify:
>
>
>
