RE: cvs commit: xml-cocoon2/documentation/xdocs index.xml

2001-11-29 Thread giacomo
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:56 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: cvs commit: xml-cocoon2/documentation/xdocs index.xml > > > > > > On 29 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > &

RE: cvs commit: xml-cocoon2/documentation/xdocs index.xml

2001-11-29 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: cvs commit: xml-cocoon2/documentation/xdocs index.xml > > > On 29 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Did anybody objected to the old text? > > Giacomo > > > cziegeler01/11/29 06:33:32 > > > > Modified:

RE: cvs commit: xml-cocoon2/documentation/xdocs index.xml

2001-11-29 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
That's a good question, someone did only update the 2.1 branch! Carsten > -Original Message- > From: giacomo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:56 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: cvs commit: xml-coco

Re: cvs commit: xml-cocoon2/documentation/xdocs index.xml

2001-11-29 Thread giacomo
On 29 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did anybody objected to the old text? Giacomo > cziegeler01/11/29 06:33:32 > > Modified:documentation/xdocs index.xml > Log: > Synced docs > > Revision ChangesPath > 1.9 +17 -10xml-cocoon2/documentation/xdocs/index.xml > >

Re: cvs commit: xml-cocoon2/documentation/xdocs index.xml

2001-11-29 Thread giacomo
On 29 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why isn't this in sync with the 2.1 branch? Giacomo > cziegeler01/11/29 06:23:20 > > Modified:documentation/xdocs Tag: cocoon_20_branch index.xml > Log: > Added introduction > > Revision ChangesPath > No revision >