Re: xml-cocoon2 status, RE: Hailing all committers.

2002-01-30 Thread David Crossley
uot; Probably a relic of copying the licence as a template. --David Crossley > > -Original Message- > > From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 6:54 PM > > To: Norman Walsh > > Cc: Vadim Gritsenko; Apache Coc

RE: xml-cocoon2 status, RE: Hailing all committers.

2002-01-30 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Done. Thanks, Norman! Vadim > -Original Message- > From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 6:54 PM > To: Norman Walsh > Cc: Vadim Gritsenko; Apache Cocoon; Dirk-Willem van Gulik > Subject: Re: xml-cocoon2 status, RE: Hail

Re: xml-cocoon2 status, RE: Hailing all committers.

2002-01-30 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Norman Walsh wrote: > > / Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > | you said resolver.jar was released with an intermetiate BSD license. > | Where is it? > > It's in the throes of publication now at > >http://www.sun.com/xml/developers/resolver/ > > that link should take

Re: xml-cocoon2 status, RE: Hailing all committers.

2002-01-30 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Sam Ruby wrote: > > Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > > > - Sun Microsystems, Inc. Binary Code License Agreement > > "... > > JIMI SDK, Version 2.0 SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERMS > > > > b. License to Distribute Runtime. Subject to your > > obligation to indemnify Sun pursuant to Section 3 > > below,

RE: xml-cocoon2 status, RE: Hailing all committers.

2002-01-30 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Update: 1. I have got license for the jstyle package - the last jar in xml-cocoon2 CVS module which was without license. Original of the license text located at: http://astyle.sourceforge.net/license.html 2. Hewlett Packard License mentioned below is the BSD style license. Vadim > -Origin

RE: xml-cocoon2 status, RE: Hailing all committers.

2002-01-30 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Tricky... OK, then we roll out tomorrow with the jars and remove them after the release. Great! Carsten > -Original Message- > From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 6:07 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: xml-cocoon2 stat

RE: xml-cocoon2 status, RE: Hailing all committers.

2002-01-30 Thread Sam Ruby
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > >> So we have to remove them, right? > > But we can include them in (at least) 2.0.1 release tarball - according > to Sam it's allowed. To avoid dramatic changes in the last minute. +1 - Sam Ruby - To

RE: xml-cocoon2 status, RE: Hailing all committers.

2002-01-30 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
ge- > > From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:36 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: xml-cocoon2 status, RE: Hailing all committers. > > > > > > Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > > > > > http:

RE: xml-cocoon2 status, RE: Hailing all committers.

2002-01-30 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
So we have to remove them, right? Carsten > -Original Message- > From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:36 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: xml-cocoon2 status, RE: Hailing all committers. > > > Vadim Grits

RE: xml-cocoon2 status, RE: Hailing all committers.

2002-01-30 Thread Sam Ruby
Mark Butler wrote: > > Also the HP license we are using for DELI / Jena is a BSD license - hope > this is okay. BSD is wonderful! ;-) - Sam Ruby - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMA

RE: xml-cocoon2 status, RE: Hailing all committers.

2002-01-30 Thread Sam Ruby
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-cocoon2/lib/optional/jimi-1.0.jar > > How FOP community is going to solve this? It's came from FOP CVS. They got the same "hailing all committers" e-mail. ;-) > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-cocoon2/lib/optional/resolver.j

RE: xml-cocoon2 status, RE: Hailing all committers.

2002-01-30 Thread Butler, Mark
Hi Vadim > > Also the HP license we are using for DELI / Jena is a BSD license - > hope > > this is okay. > > Can I add a note then, like: > [Note: this is the 'BSD License' as endorsed by OpenSource.org.] > It will save some time for the readers ;) Yes, that's fine - good idea. cheers Mark

RE: xml-cocoon2 status, RE: Hailing all committers.

2002-01-30 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
> From: Butler, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Hi Vadim > > Just a quick confirmation that rdffilter is public domain and there is no > license available. It is written by Dave Megginson - > http://www.megginson.com/index.html - but this just links to the sourceforge > site you've already s

RE: xml-cocoon2 status, RE: Hailing all committers.

2002-01-30 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
> From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > > > - Sun Microsystems, Inc. Binary Code License Agreement > > "... > > JIMI SDK, Version 2.0 SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERMS > > > > b. License to Distribute Runtime. Subject to your > > obligation to indemnify Sun pursu

RE: xml-cocoon2 status, RE: Hailing all committers.

2002-01-30 Thread Butler, Mark
Hi Vadim Just a quick confirmation that rdffilter is public domain and there is no license available. It is written by Dave Megginson - http://www.megginson.com/index.html - but this just links to the sourceforge site you've already seen. Also the HP license we are using for DELI / Jena is a BS

Re: xml-cocoon2 status, RE: Hailing all committers.

2002-01-30 Thread Sam Ruby
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > - Sun Microsystems, Inc. Binary Code License Agreement > "... > JIMI SDK, Version 2.0 SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERMS > > b. License to Distribute Runtime. Subject to your > obligation to indemnify Sun pursuant to Section 3 > below, Sun grants to you a non-exclusive, >