On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:54:49 +0200, Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> >http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/proposals/workflow.html
> >
>
> Interesting proposal. But it's sooo much more verbose than the same
> thing in JavaScript with our flow engine...
Th
From: "Sylvain Wallez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> >http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/proposals/workflow.html
> >
>
> Interesting proposal. But it's sooo much more verbose than the same
> thing in JavaScript with our flow engine...
Definately.
> Hey, what about an XSL to
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/proposals/workflow.html
>
Interesting proposal. But it's sooo much more verbose than the same
thing in JavaScript with our flow engine...
Hey, what about an XSL to translate this XML language to JavaScript ? I
have the impression tha
m: Gerhard Froehlich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 7:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [FYI] Struts flow proposal
>From: John Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>
>> http://j
>From: John Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>
>> http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/proposals/workflow.html
>
>Humm, some of that looks quite familiar...
Indeed
Good night
~Gerhard
+--
> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/proposals/workflow.html
Humm, some of that looks quite familiar...
J.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comman