On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Christian Haul wrote:
> On 04.Dec.2001 -- 05:45 PM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> > Stefano Mazzocchi a écrit :
> > >
> > > Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> > >
> > > > Why is a new "map:variable" needed ? As for now, map:redirect doesn't
> > > > have parameters, but we could define the sema
Christian Haul wrote:
> OK, since the discussion petered out around here and I got the
> impression that we were agreeing on this I have added
>
>
>
>
>
>
> to sitemap.xsl
>
> I haven't updated the docs (actually I have but I didn't commit them)
> just in case I was wrong. If I receive
On 04.Dec.2001 -- 05:45 PM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> Stefano Mazzocchi a écrit :
> >
> > Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> >
> > > Why is a new "map:variable" needed ? As for now, map:redirect doesn't
> > > have parameters, but we could define the semantic for parameters of
> > > map:redirect as sitemap pa
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> > Let me tell you: instead of modifying the sitemap, we must make Cocoon
> > better at general exception throwing because, as it currently stands,
> > it's dead verbose but deadly useless :(
>
> Yep, and this is exactly my concern, also because it stems from unfinishe
- Original Message -
From: "Stefano Mazzocchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 12:08 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] directly setting variables in sitemap
> [people, please remove the text that is not relevant to your reply,
[people, please remove the text that is not relevant to your reply, that
both reduces load on the apache machines (which costs!) and improves
readability. Thanks]
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> > Sure, it would be useful for us, but how useful would it be for our
> > users in the longer term?
>
> The
Stefano Mazzocchi a écrit :
>
> Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
> > Why is a new "map:variable" needed ? As for now, map:redirect doesn't
> > have parameters, but we could define the semantic for parameters of
> > map:redirect as sitemap parameters that are set prior to calling the
> > resource. This
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> Why is a new "map:variable" needed ? As for now, map:redirect doesn't
> have parameters, but we could define the semantic for parameters of
> map:redirect as sitemap parameters that are set prior to calling the
> resource. This would lead to the following :
>
>
>
On 04.Dec.2001 -- 10:30 AM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
>
> Christian Haul a écrit :
> > Although it breaks the current rule, that only components do have parameters.
>
> I wasn't aware of this rule...
OK, I've just made that one up ;-) But it does describe the current
situation AFAIK.
Ch
Christian Haul a écrit :
>
> On 03.Dec.2001 -- 05:51 PM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> >
> > Stefano Mazzocchi a écrit :
> > >
> > > Christian Haul wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There's no language element that allows setting of sitemap parameters
> > > > er, variables. They are usually the result of sitema
On 03.Dec.2001 -- 05:51 PM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
> Stefano Mazzocchi a écrit :
> >
> > Christian Haul wrote:
> > >
> > > There's no language element that allows setting of sitemap parameters
> > > er, variables. They are usually the result of sitemap components
> > > execution. More in particu
- Original Message -
From: "Sylvain Wallez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] directly setting variables in sitemap
>
>
> Stefano Mazzocchi a écrit :
> >
> &g
Stefano Mazzocchi a écrit :
>
> Christian Haul wrote:
> >
> > Team, shall we have a vote on this?
> >
> > There's no language element that allows setting of sitemap parameters
> > er, variables. They are usually the result of sitemap components
> > execution. More in particular, from those comp
Christian Haul wrote:
>
> Team, shall we have a vote on this?
>
> There's no language element that allows setting of sitemap parameters
> er, variables. They are usually the result of sitemap components
> execution. More in particular, from those components that are used to
> determine the actua
14 matches
Mail list logo