On Friday, June 7, 2002, at 12:56 PM, Mikhail Fedotov wrote:
>
>> We are perfectly aware of the issues with documentation
>
> ...and I'm aware that you are aware of it, sorry for
> bothering. :) But...
>
>> and we are moving as fast as we can to improve things,
>> believe me, also along with th
- Original Message -
From: "Steven Noels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 11:39 AM
Subject: RE: Cocoon article on JDJ
> > From: Andy Lewis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> > Just a s
I'm fine with SQUID...my was relating to a way to improive perceived performance of
the base
distribution
>> From: Andy Lewis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>> Just a suggestion here on item 2 - take it for what it is worth.
>>
>> The recommended way to improve performance is with somethin
Hi!
> We are perfectly aware of the issues with documentation
...and I'm aware that you are aware of it, sorry for
bothering. :) But...
> and we are moving as fast as we can to improve things,
> believe me, also along with the forrest effort.
>
> I'm pretty sure that things will be better in t
> From: Andy Lewis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Just a suggestion here on item 2 - take it for what it is worth.
>
> The recommended way to improve performance is with something
> like SQUID - a proxy cache. THat is
> the approahc I take, and by all accounts it works well.
If you combine Tom
Just a suggestion here on item 2 - take it for what it is worth.
The recommended way to improve performance is with something like SQUID - a proxy
cache. THat is
the approahc I take, and by all accounts it works well. Unfortunately, "out of the
box" Cocoon
doesn't have that, so it appears
Mikhail Fedotov wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> > This once again clearly shows that Cocoon needs marketing
> > !
>
> Good point, but I've been trying to do some basic stuff in
> cocoon for the last few days. I was able to do all
> information I want, but at least half of that information
> come from java s
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
>
> The other good news is that the whole Cocoon environment will have the
> Expires information, since it's in the objectModel. This might lead to a
> change in the cache algorithms (I'm waiting for Carsten to finish up his
> event/stream cache unification to have a
Ivelin Ivanov wrote:
> It's sad to read though that:
> 2) Cocoon is not applicable for large scale applications.
> With the new contribution for Expires response header and caching
> improvements, 2) shouldn't be a big deal any more.
> BTW, is Expires checked in already?
Definitely yes, in HEAD
Hi!
> Your document contributions will be appreciated.
> As you are probably aware Diana Shannon is driving this
> effort currently.
Of course.
> You may want to get in touch with her to obtain a list of
> pending documents.
After exams...
Mikhail
ROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: Cocoon article on JDJ
> Hi!
>
> > This once again clearly shows that Cocoon needs marketing
> > !
>
> Good point, but I've been trying to do some basic stuff in
&
Good article. Inspiring for the new comers.
It's sad to read though that:
1) Cocoon may not catch up with big enough user base, so there is a risk of
using it.
2) Cocoon is not applicable for large scale applications.
Those new couple books coming out this year will certainly help with 1).
Ar
Hi!
> This once again clearly shows that Cocoon needs marketing
> !
Good point, but I've been trying to do some basic stuff in
cocoon for the last few days. I was able to do all
information I want, but at least half of that information
come from java sources. I've been had to use full-text
searc
13 matches
Mail list logo
