Re: Cocoon performance using MemoryStore

2003-06-11 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: So my question is, why don't we use this implementation, to make Cocoon more scalable? ;-) You can. Have you tried it yet? I guess what Volker means is adding your new implementation from the scratchpad to excalibur store (btw, you hav

RE: RE: Cocoon performance using MemoryStore

2003-06-11 Thread volker . schmitt
Carsten wrote: >Vadim Gritsenko wrote: >> >So my question is, why don't we use this implementation, to make Cocoon >> >more scalable? ;-) >> > >> >> You can. Have you tried it yet? >> > I guess what Volker means is adding your new implementation from the > scratchpad to excalibur store (btw, you

RE: Cocoon performance using MemoryStore

2003-06-10 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > >So my question is, why don't we use this implementation, to make Cocoon > >more scalable? ;-) > > > > You can. Have you tried it yet? > I guess what Volker means is adding your new implementation from the scratchpad to excalibur store (btw, you have the commit rights for

Re: Cocoon performance using MemoryStore

2003-06-10 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I changed the subject because with the old one (org.apache.excalibur.store.impl.MRUMemoryStore) I didn't get any response :-( Vadim any comments? I still had your original email in the inbox... Volker Hi, org.apache.excalibur.store.impl.MRUMemoryStore should looku