Re: [RT:Long] Initial Results and comments (was Re: Compiling XML,and its replacement)

2003-04-04 Thread Berin Loritsch
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Considering we have a 5:1 size to time scaling ratio, it would be interesting to see if it carries out to a much larger XML file-- if only I had one. If scalability was linear, then a 1,580,000 byte file should only take .23 ms to parse. Are you aware of the fact that an

Re: [RT:Long] Initial Results and comments (was Re: Compiling XML,and its replacement)

2003-04-04 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Berin Loritsch wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: I'll also be interested to see how different the performance gets on hotspot server/client and how much it changes with several subsequent runs. Well, with HotSpot client and a 15.4 KB (15,798 bytes) test document (my build.xml file), I got the fo

Re: Compiling XML, and its replacement

2003-04-03 Thread Berin Loritsch
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Berin Loritsch wrote: BTW, My Binary XML project (http://d-haven.org/bxml) has the ability to compile an XML document into a Java Class (I know this is nothing extraordinary as XSP has been doing it for years). However what is very different from XSP is the following: 1)

Re: Compiling XML, and its replacement

2003-04-03 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Berin Loritsch wrote: BTW, My Binary XML project (http://d-haven.org/bxml) has the ability to compile an XML document into a Java Class (I know this is nothing extraordinary as XSP has been doing it for years). However what is very different from XSP is the following: 1) No Java file is ever writ