Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
> Berin,
> Any thoughts? Should we fix this now?
We should not remove the "throws ComponentException" in ComposerGenerator,
or similar classes. That would preclude the Component from functioning as
it should.
>
> Thanks,
> dims
>
> --- Peter Royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Berin,
Any thoughts? Should we fix this now?
Thanks,
dims
--- Peter Royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 11:45 AM 6/4/2001 -0400, you wrote:
> > > Is there a reason why the compose method of the ComposerGenerator class
> > > does not throw a ComponentException? The Composable interface specifie
At 11:45 AM 6/4/2001 -0400, you wrote:
> > Is there a reason why the compose method of the ComposerGenerator class
> > does not throw a ComponentException? The Composable interface specifies
> > that a ComponentException can be throw from that method.
>
>no reason that I know of. But you will no
Peter Royal wrote:
>
> Is there a reason why the compose method of the ComposerGenerator class
> does not throw a ComponentException? The Composable interface specifies
> that a ComponentException can be throw from that method.
> -pete
no reason that I know of. But you will notice that the com
